Viewing 15 posts - 571 through 585 (of 827 total)
Another tricky and bad worded question.
In the earlier versions of any DBMS, the foreign key was implemented thru triggers.
So the answer should be "YES, implemented by trigger."
Or change the question:...
April 6, 2012 at 2:02 am
I tried on my production server:
I got interesting results
ordering by [Total IO] instead of [Average IO].
Thanks!
April 4, 2012 at 1:10 am
cengland0 (3/30/2012)
March 30, 2012 at 3:20 am
Easy question!
Good practice is never use "SELECT * FROM" in view, too.
😉
March 27, 2012 at 1:24 am
baabhu (3/19/2012)
Thank you bitbucket. Nice and straight forward question.--- Babu
+1
Thank you very much.
March 20, 2012 at 2:01 am
GilaMonster (3/19/2012)
March 19, 2012 at 3:17 am
R.P.Rozema (3/8/2012)
The proper explanation has been given in this thread. To be sure I...
March 8, 2012 at 2:56 am
R.P.Rozema (3/8/2012)
tim.kay (3/8/2012)
Got it right and thought that I understood - now looking at the other posts I am slightly confused.
So am I, as I was very sure I had...
March 8, 2012 at 2:39 am
R.P.Rozema (3/8/2012)
To preserve duplicates in only...
March 8, 2012 at 1:34 am
I get it right, but I disagree with explanation:
If at least one 'Union' is used, duplicates will be removed from the entire final result set, no matter where the 'Union'...
March 8, 2012 at 1:11 am
Viewing 15 posts - 571 through 585 (of 827 total)