Viewing 15 posts - 4,246 through 4,260 (of 7,484 total)
Scott Beckstead (10/20/2005)
synchronous, asynchronous...
I was expecting something related to time. An asynchronous process is one that is not timed to a particular event. A synchronous process is locked to...
August 12, 2012 at 8:44 am
Interesting.
So the difference between synchronous and asynchronous is not that the one oeperates synchronously (it returns a row for each input row, and returns it before it gets the next...
August 12, 2012 at 8:42 am
Why on earth assume that SQL logins exist on that server. It contains my accounting database, for goodness sake!
It is good practise to use a strong password for distributor_admin...
August 12, 2012 at 7:49 am
Good question. Not a good explanation, I needed to read all the comments before I understood where I was going wrong.
I think I agree with the suggestion that this...
August 12, 2012 at 7:06 am
Although the script task has to be in VB, if you want to write in a different language you can develop a custom package in any .net language and just...
August 12, 2012 at 6:40 am
I think this question and answer are conflating db_owner and permissions on the dbo schema. They are not the same thing in SQL 2008 onwards, and I don't think...
August 12, 2012 at 6:21 am
I suppose it depends on how one interprets "upgrade". An SQL Server 2000 Enterprise edition could not be upgraded in situ to SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition. That's...
August 12, 2012 at 6:11 am
It would have been better to reference the BoL page (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms191152%28v=sql.90%29.aspx (or rather, given the date, it would have been that url but without "(v=sql.90)") than the reference provided, which...
August 12, 2012 at 5:37 am
I got this right, but I think the question and explanation are bad, they contain a false assumption. At least it's a false assumption for 2008 and I don't...
August 12, 2012 at 5:27 am
Ignacio A. Salom Rangel (5/6/2008)
I agree with Yelena!
I too agree with Yelena, in the circumstances I would want to see not only who is logged in riqght now using sql...
August 12, 2012 at 4:54 am
I don't know what the original wording was, because it was corrected nearly 7 years before I saw it. With the current wording, it is quite a difficult task...
August 12, 2012 at 4:29 am
Jan Van der Eecken (8/11/2012)
August 11, 2012 at 12:56 pm
I didn't like the misleading topic, but otherwise thought it was a very good question. Of course a topic like "scope and dynamic sql" would have made it too...
August 11, 2012 at 12:22 pm
Nice easy question to start the week with (2 days early).
I wonder if the 100% correct rate will continue when everyone sees it and starts answering on Monday. 😀
August 11, 2012 at 11:59 am
This is a nice straightforward question, especially now that the typo has been corrected. The stackover reference is not a very good one though, since as Ron points out...
August 11, 2012 at 11:55 am
Viewing 15 posts - 4,246 through 4,260 (of 7,484 total)