Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 406 through 420 (of 584 total)

  • RE: NOT BETWEEN

    Carlo Romagnano (3/30/2012)


    cengland0 (3/30/2012)


    This one was so easy that I was looking for the "trick." I kept look and looking but never found one so I finally submitted my...

  • RE: SSIS-Fast Parse

    Nice change-up question. Thanks for your efforts!

  • RE: SQL Server Agent Roles

    Wow, Steve, always interesting. After reading all the responses, I'm tempted to jump in. But, I'm in a good mood this morning, and I did correctly parse the intent in...

  • RE: SOME

    Igor, congratulations on finding an easy way to pad your score! 🙂

    Steve, Thanks for the question.

  • RE: Looping

    Thanks for the question. It's nice to see questions from newer people. While I always appreciate the questions posted by the mainstay contributors to the site, it's good to see...

  • RE: Combining union and union all

    Excellent question. Glad you could learn something too! Thanks for your efforts.

  • RE: Arithmetic 1

    Excellent question. Code parsing for a reason, with clear explanation. Thanks bitbucket!

  • RE: SQL Server Agent Roles

    Nice change of pace. Thanks for the question. But, a bit too many incorrect answers for an easy question.

  • RE: Table Value Constructor 1

    Thanks for the question. It was very useful, and presented in a way that required thought, but without parsing dozens of lines of text. Excellent.

  • RE: T-SQL Performance 1

    Koen Verbeeck (2/16/2012)


    Nice question. I immediately chose "yes", because it would have been quite sad if you couldn't force a seek somehow 🙂

    Yes, I answered "yes" immediately, as I want...

  • RE: T-SQL Performance 1

    danielfountain (2/17/2012)

    Agreed - unfortunately due to the likelyhood of nincompoops its still a viable option!

    We're big on "Quality Initiatives" where I work, and our biggest customer is always sending along...

  • RE: Subscriber Backup Devices

    Thanks for the question Steve. Swamped with things today, so the simple/straightforward question got the day off to a good start.

  • RE: HASHBYTES

    L' Eomot Inversé (2/9/2012)That quote comes from a section in whch the topic is encryption and encrypted data ...

    Thanks! It's as I suspected. I took it out of context...

  • RE: HASHBYTES

    Thanks for the question. Hoever, I got it wrong because I used this source:

    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc837966(SQL.100).aspx

    which says:

    "It is not possible to specify the salt value in SQL Server."

    Can someone please expain why...

  • RE: INSERT OUTPUT

    Stuart Davies (2/2/2012)


    Simple question - thanks.

    No trap - thanks.

    Points today - thanks

    I agree, and am also concise and grateful.

Viewing 15 posts - 406 through 420 (of 584 total)