Viewing 15 posts - 406 through 420 (of 584 total)
Carlo Romagnano (3/30/2012)
cengland0 (3/30/2012)
March 30, 2012 at 5:26 am
Wow, Steve, always interesting. After reading all the responses, I'm tempted to jump in. But, I'm in a good mood this morning, and I did correctly parse the intent in...
March 22, 2012 at 5:30 am
Thanks for the question. It's nice to see questions from newer people. While I always appreciate the questions posted by the mainstay contributors to the site, it's good to see...
March 16, 2012 at 6:23 am
Excellent question. Glad you could learn something too! Thanks for your efforts.
March 8, 2012 at 5:28 am
Excellent question. Code parsing for a reason, with clear explanation. Thanks bitbucket!
February 29, 2012 at 5:31 am
Nice change of pace. Thanks for the question. But, a bit too many incorrect answers for an easy question.
February 28, 2012 at 5:24 am
Thanks for the question. It was very useful, and presented in a way that required thought, but without parsing dozens of lines of text. Excellent.
February 27, 2012 at 5:25 am
Koen Verbeeck (2/16/2012)
Nice question. I immediately chose "yes", because it would have been quite sad if you couldn't force a seek somehow 🙂
Yes, I answered "yes" immediately, as I want...
February 17, 2012 at 5:36 am
danielfountain (2/17/2012)
Agreed - unfortunately due to the likelyhood of nincompoops its still a viable option!
We're big on "Quality Initiatives" where I work, and our biggest customer is always sending along...
February 17, 2012 at 5:34 am
Thanks for the question Steve. Swamped with things today, so the simple/straightforward question got the day off to a good start.
February 16, 2012 at 5:21 am
L' Eomot Inversé (2/9/2012)That quote comes from a section in whch the topic is encryption and encrypted data ...
Thanks! It's as I suspected. I took it out of context...
February 9, 2012 at 6:17 am
Thanks for the question. Hoever, I got it wrong because I used this source:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc837966(SQL.100).aspx
which says:
"It is not possible to specify the salt value in SQL Server."
Can someone please expain why...
February 9, 2012 at 5:31 am
Stuart Davies (2/2/2012)
Simple question - thanks.No trap - thanks.
Points today - thanks
I agree, and am also concise and grateful.
February 2, 2012 at 5:25 am
Viewing 15 posts - 406 through 420 (of 584 total)