Viewing 15 posts - 1,651 through 1,665 (of 4,081 total)
Including moderation.
To heck with Russell's Paradox.
April 3, 2010 at 11:14 pm
Best I can do while the coffee is perking, Emperor Palpitate.
April 3, 2010 at 8:47 am
In books online (under "LIKE Comparisons") I found no syntax to support an OR. Nothing under the index topics of PATINDEX or WILDCARD, either.
ms-help://MS.SQLCC.v10/MS.SQLSVR.v10.en/s10de_6tsql/html/581fb289-29f9-412b-869c-18d33a9e93d5.htm
April 2, 2010 at 10:48 pm
Sometimes I read comments on these forums, and others, where people are recommending very elegant solutions to problems, however, they don't always take in to account the amount of time...
April 2, 2010 at 10:32 pm
Kramaswamy,
I sincerely hope that you didn't take any of my comments as belittling your competence. Nothing of the sort was intended. My last...
April 2, 2010 at 10:09 pm
In short, table variables are handled VERY much like temp tables. A couple of major differences follow:
Table variables aren't subject to logging.
Statistics aren't kept on table variables, which...
April 1, 2010 at 2:44 pm
WayneS (4/1/2010)
April 1, 2010 at 12:18 pm
I thought "hamster" was a collation.
April 1, 2010 at 9:46 am
Dangit... I hoped to be one-up on Gail just once before I die. Of course if F and E were reversed, there would have been no right answer.......
April 1, 2010 at 9:44 am
Paul, I'm curious. I understand right-padding the high value with char(255) to simulate a wildcard, but why add CHAR(1) to the low value?
April 1, 2010 at 9:36 am
Actually, I like this approach. The only thing I would suggest is to tweak it to accept character strings with a length greater than 1.
...
April 1, 2010 at 9:14 am
Viewing 15 posts - 1,651 through 1,665 (of 4,081 total)