Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 133 total)
A big thank you to all.
Very much appreciated.
🙂
cheers
dbgeezer
January 9, 2005 at 9:53 am
they do need to be handled differently. if anyone is interested:
comm.Connection =
this.conn;
comm.CommandText =
"sp_mysproc";
comm.CommandType = CommandType.StoredProcedure;
comm.Parameters.Add(
"@id1", SqlDbType.Int).Value=51 cheers dbgeezer
October 19, 2004 at 2:45 am
i don't know if this is true or ondicative of another problem.
we had a three tier app that handled hundreds of connections with no problems. ASAIK sql server handles the...
cheers
dbgeezer
September 10, 2004 at 7:22 am
try using SQLCommand and setting the CommandTimout to a higher value
SqlCommand comm =
new SqlCommand(strQuery, conn);
comm.CommandTimeout =
300;
if you still get the...
cheers
dbgeezer
September 10, 2004 at 4:51 am
check out http://forums.devshed.com/archive/t-166713 contains a somewhat messy solution that would slow down pretty quickly the 'deeper' you wanted to delve.
cheers
dbgeezer
September 10, 2004 at 4:32 am
I agree also, there have been many arguments that i've had with programmers about the design of the database being more important and this article gets it spot on.
cheers
dbgeezer
September 8, 2004 at 5:41 am
i couldn't find any reported bug that matched your situation but did frind this http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=31049
which may include help - haven't read it yet so don't know but it is...
cheers
dbgeezer
September 7, 2004 at 9:27 am
I totally agree with AKM.
Once Yukon comes along as well the .net framework will be kind of important ![]()
cheers
dbgeezer
August 24, 2004 at 5:19 am
have a look at the Identity keyword in BOL for the first part of your question.
i don't understand the second part
cheers
dbgeezer
July 29, 2004 at 7:40 am
I can't understand why you have structured the data in your tables in this way.
Maybe a better approach would be to look at a better design to solve your problem...
cheers
dbgeezer
July 28, 2004 at 4:59 am
I can confirm this is the case. I was on the Ascend Beta program for Yukon at my old place of work and the NDA is pretty tight. They wouldn't...
cheers
dbgeezer
June 25, 2004 at 7:33 am
this should get you going
exec dbo.sp_MSforeachdb @command1="use ?;DBCC SHOWCONTIG"
cheers
dbgeezer
June 17, 2004 at 9:46 am
this seemed ok at a glance ...
http://databases.about.com/library/weekly/aa031101c.htm
google is littered with examples on transactions and power failures
cheers
dbgeezer
June 16, 2004 at 1:49 am
all uncommitted transactions will be rolled back to keep the database in a consistent state
cheers
dbgeezer
June 15, 2004 at 3:16 am
what about select max(sum(quantity)) from ...
cheers
dbgeezer
June 15, 2004 at 2:56 am
Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 133 total)