Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 132 total)
i used postresql for 18 months and loved it. the learning curve is minimal as long as your staff are keen to embrace something that isn't windoze.
totally agree with you...
November 15, 2005 at 10:10 am
thank you Jesper, that's exactly what we need.
i must have thries everything except that ! thanks again.
July 18, 2005 at 4:24 am
if you liked that wrapping it in sp_msforeachtable should save you some time ...
June 9, 2005 at 9:30 am
doesn't public just let you see the db is there ????
didn't think it granted any permisssions at all ?
June 9, 2005 at 9:26 am
So would you go for a key of a varchar(20) then and write a custom encoding sheme to enable it to be indexed quickly (as I believe the GUIDs in...
June 9, 2005 at 9:10 am
We need it to report other errors though.
Creating an application would be ideal but not in the environment we work in. Might be a way forward in the future though.
June 9, 2005 at 9:05 am
thanks for the link -
the problem relates to some code written by anotehr guy in the team so i've passed on your link -
the 1222 error is caught on...
June 9, 2005 at 8:47 am
June 9, 2005 at 7:37 am
I see what you mean.
I do kind of sympathise and do agree totally that keys should be part of the entity they represent but could see the argument become indefensible...
June 9, 2005 at 7:24 am
I was wondering what you meant by 'IDENTITY is both a proprietary data type and never a key; BIT is a proprietary data type;'
Would you not use an IDENTITY...
June 9, 2005 at 7:08 am
It might be able to see the memory but would not be able to use it without the switches.
You need to use the memory counters in perfmon if you want...
June 9, 2005 at 2:02 am
To the dark side poor design leads.
June 9, 2005 at 1:58 am
any ideas anyone ?
June 8, 2005 at 4:15 pm
this is another classic example of programmers getting their hands on the data, brainstorming, and then coming up with a solution that probably fits their needs and they can rationalise...
June 8, 2005 at 4:09 pm
not sure what you mean exactly but you could add the user as 'public' in the database and then grant them permissions against the table you want them to see...
June 8, 2005 at 4:02 pm