Viewing 15 posts - 8,836 through 8,850 (of 19,562 total)
GilaMonster (9/1/2011)
SQLRNNR (9/1/2011)
September 1, 2011 at 4:09 pm
Looks like just the tools upgraded and not the database engine.
September 1, 2011 at 3:01 pm
More of an issue to make sure ducks are in a row. Want to make sure a migration is planned out properly and that takes time.
September 1, 2011 at 3:00 pm
Jeff Moden (9/1/2011)
SQLRNNR (9/1/2011)
GSquared (9/1/2011)
September 1, 2011 at 2:56 pm
GSquared (9/1/2011)
SQLRNNR (9/1/2011)
GSquared (9/1/2011)
September 1, 2011 at 2:22 pm
GSquared (9/1/2011)
September 1, 2011 at 1:56 pm
Nice question. Better than the question is the explanation given.
Thanks Paul.
September 1, 2011 at 12:44 am
webtekkie alludes to another important thing.
This really is an effort that requires communication and teamwork. Net Admins and DBAs together should be working to physically inventory the SQL Instances...
August 31, 2011 at 12:55 pm
Those databases if not maintained can pose a risk and threat to your entire environment.
August 31, 2011 at 12:32 pm
I agree with Roy. Based on the info, I'd start by removing the cursor.
It also appears that you are using temp tables for staging the data. Are these...
August 31, 2011 at 11:32 am
Read the first article in my sig. Gail walks you through how to post that info.
August 31, 2011 at 10:19 am
On second thought - there is the procedure cache.
Try this:
http://sqlserverpedia.com/wiki/Queries_in_Procedure_Cache
Keep in mind, that this is not a fool proof method to retrieve past queries.
August 31, 2011 at 1:17 am
Without some form of logging that you setup (like triggers or traces) - no.
August 31, 2011 at 1:15 am
Viewing 15 posts - 8,836 through 8,850 (of 19,562 total)