Viewing 15 posts - 5,536 through 5,550 (of 6,105 total)
No. This information is going to appear unencrypted in sysobjects and syscolumns and the Information Schema views. You could potentially create nonsensical table and column names that would...
March 4, 2002 at 7:51 am
From the Microsoft Security Checklist, if the web server is exposed to the outside (Internet), it should be in its own workgroup. What that accomplishes is even if someone...
March 4, 2002 at 7:43 am
Thanks for the kind words! BTW, the latest issue of SQL Server Magazine has an article about using account delegation in Windows 2000 Active Directory to get around this...
March 4, 2002 at 7:38 am
I'm part of source selection for a password reset project which is looking to keep passwords in synch between NT and the mainframe. Pretty much all of the vendors...
March 3, 2002 at 9:25 pm
The way Multiprotocol works, it'll pass the computer name to RPC, and RPC will attempt to make a connection to the server using each supported NetLibrary present: Named Pipes, TCP/IP,...
March 3, 2002 at 9:21 pm
Andy's solution I think is the only real way without going to triggers or expanding the index (composite column unique constraint) that will be created to handle uniqueness. SQL...
March 3, 2002 at 9:15 pm
I would think that even if the old execution plan was being reused for whatever reason, this is a prime candidate for that little used RECOMPILE option upon stored procedure...
March 3, 2002 at 9:07 pm
BTW, this is the reason SQL Servers should not be directly exposed to the Internet (and a reason to chain SQL Servers together to ensure sensitive data is a couple...
March 3, 2002 at 9:03 pm
Anything other than what Andy or Steve suggests makes me nervous from a security perspective. If you need to retrofit something, you can build your query by doing something...
March 3, 2002 at 8:57 pm
Another thing to consider is the hardware angle... both Compaq and Sun are starting to produce "blades." With so many vendors requiring servers to be dedicated to their application,...
March 3, 2002 at 8:45 pm
Unfortunately, no. Profiler is merely a running log of user activity. As a result, it would have to keep a cache of info and do interpretation on the...
March 3, 2002 at 8:40 pm
Hi Ralph,
Can you post a bit more information about the environment (SQL Server version, Service Pack, mail client, mail server type)? There are an assortment of issues depending on...
March 3, 2002 at 8:37 pm
Triggers aren't allowed on system tables. Besides, a trigger on sysprocesses would fire every time a connection was made to the database.
K. Brian Kelley
March 1, 2002 at 11:15 am
I've not seen any in depth articles on deadlocking. You are right about the Microsoft scripts. They are designed for blocking in general.
K. Brian Kelley
March 1, 2002 at 7:28 am
SQL Server 2000:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q271509
SQL Server 7:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q251004
The amount of information captured can be pretty extensive. As a result, it's generally not a good idea to run the script continuously, but rather...
February 28, 2002 at 8:59 am
Viewing 15 posts - 5,536 through 5,550 (of 6,105 total)