Viewing 15 posts - 1,951 through 1,965 (of 6,105 total)
Unfortunately, SQL Server 2000 doesn't have the ability to enforce password complexity. SQL Server 2005 will enforce what the OS knows if you are running on Windows Server 2003 (Windows...
November 15, 2006 at 7:32 am
This is likely not a physical memory issue... That referenced memory is the virtual memory space. As to how to uninstall it, you may have to do it manually:
November 14, 2006 at 11:43 pm
The free way of doing it is to use Performance Monitor and export the data to Excel. It's pretty simple to do. If you need more details (shameless plug), I...
November 14, 2006 at 11:39 pm
There is nothing specific to any technologies with respect to Microsoft, as I believe even in an NLB cluster SQL Server still only has one node servicing all clients. In...
November 14, 2006 at 11:38 pm
You'll want to set up server side traces to do this. The auditing won't be obvious to a person in the datbase because it's at the server level. With that...
November 14, 2006 at 11:30 pm
This should go without saying, but modifying sp_password will bring your server into a potentially unsupported state. Otherwise, piggy backing on the previous two posts by Remi, testing that specific...
November 14, 2006 at 11:15 pm
If you are using SQL Server 2005, don't use syslogins. Instead use the system management view sys.sql_logins. There is a column, is_disabled, which is a flag for whether or not...
November 13, 2006 at 7:17 am
Run a Profiler trace on the server being linked to. Make sure you add in Audit Login Failure as an event. Try to use the linked server connection. If you...
October 20, 2006 at 1:55 pm
What version of the operating system, including the operating system service pack, are you running on each server? If you are running Windows Server 2003, there were fundamental changes to...
October 20, 2006 at 11:07 am
At the PASS Summit a few years ago I met the PolyServe guys and had a chance to see demos of their product. It's nice, but it's a high-availability solution......
October 20, 2006 at 11:04 am
It's not just 3rd party apps, either. Microsoft CRM 3.0 until just recently only supported default instances. You still have to jump through hoops to get a named instance working...
October 20, 2006 at 1:09 am
You shouldn't make such a change without understanding what they are trying to do security wise... this does open up the database in question and sometimes it's necessary or it's...
October 20, 2006 at 1:00 am
From a security best practices perspective, you'd want to segregate the databases accessed by your public web site from your internal (sensitive) databases and that means different servers. The risk...
October 20, 2006 at 12:56 am
Actions taken in SQL Server have no effect on the domain. If you disable a login or group in SQL Server, it only affects SQL Server. However, changes in the...
October 12, 2006 at 9:27 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 1,951 through 1,965 (of 6,105 total)