Viewing 15 posts - 3,271 through 3,285 (of 9,707 total)
Yes. Please post this to the appropriate forum for your SQL version under Business Intelligence or General. This is not the proper forum for this quesiton.
April 10, 2014 at 8:19 am
Chris Wooding (4/1/2014)
April 1, 2014 at 4:26 am
Odd question. Is there perhaps a database trigger that is rolling back any attempts at A) Executing this proc, or B) deleting data from this (or all) tables?
March 31, 2014 at 11:50 am
I think Lowell's on the right track here. It seems the jumping around has a lot to do with your issues.
If you are able to impersonate the login using this...
March 31, 2014 at 8:33 am
Is there any other information in the error you're seeing?
I've run into this issue when the procedure is doing activity that requires higher level permissions (such as Truncate Table), but...
March 31, 2014 at 6:05 am
I started off using 1024, but the math still doesn't work out correctly for what I'm seeing. (FYI: I got the 128 from a couple of different blog posts. Here's...
February 11, 2014 at 7:44 am
Steve Jones - SSC Editor (1/22/2014)
Did you check properties on all subfolders or use some other method?
The subfolder properties don't tell me if compression is on for them. I experimented...
January 22, 2014 at 9:17 am
Ah. I think it didn't uncompress the subfolders. The root allows me to restore the database files there just fine.
So, nevermind. Thanks for reading.
January 22, 2014 at 8:00 am
Well, it's MS Access actually. We have linked tables and macros pulling data but we're about to retire a server and move to a new one. So the process works...
January 16, 2014 at 12:18 pm
Given that the service account should be in sysusers, and that page you referenced updates based on userID, I would say that yes, you can do exactly what you're thinking...
January 16, 2014 at 4:48 am
John Mitchell-245523 (1/10/2014)
BrandieCould the second one be from Object Explorer or similar? I think you get the third for linked server queries.
John
I did notice that Object Explorer and the...
January 10, 2014 at 6:28 am
Lowell (1/10/2014)
January 10, 2014 at 6:09 am
To add to what Gail said, the ONLY 2 reasons you should consider shrinking TempDB would be:
1) A runaway query that has caused TempDB to grow exponentially beyond the usual...
January 10, 2014 at 5:46 am
Viewing 15 posts - 3,271 through 3,285 (of 9,707 total)