July 31, 2008 at 4:14 am
I hope you got the below output. Right ?
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
110
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
210
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
310
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
410
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
510
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
610
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
710
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
810
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
910
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
1010
karthik
July 31, 2008 at 4:17 am
What's your point, Karthik? Chris knows exactly what the output will be for any pair of numbers entered into his query...
For fast, accurate and documented assistance in answering your questions, please read this article.
Understanding and using APPLY, (I) and (II) Paul White
Hidden RBAR: Triangular Joins / The "Numbers" or "Tally" Table: What it is and how it replaces a loop Jeff Moden
July 31, 2008 at 4:31 am
Chris,
My point is, just i wanted to confirm which query is performing good.
karthik
July 31, 2008 at 4:33 am
Chris knows exactly what the output will be for any pair of numbers entered into his query...
Chris morris,
I do know he knows exactly what the output will be. I am not offending anybody here.
I just wanted to confirm the output.Because i got different result set for each method.
Chris, Karthik's corrected code has the same functionality but was it by design?:P
what are you trying to show?
karthik
December 24, 2009 at 4:30 pm
Never mind...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
Viewing 5 posts - 16 through 20 (of 20 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply