July 22, 2011 at 6:32 am
RichB (7/22/2011)
I am torn between considering this genius or madness...:pinch:
Heh... I've found there's not much difference. The quality of the outcome is normally the determining factor.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 22, 2011 at 6:53 am
In a personal database project I've been using a temp tables in all my udf's cause I need results that I can't generate with my current tables.
July 22, 2011 at 9:19 am
Very sneaky! Thank you for sharing
July 22, 2011 at 1:54 pm
your solution woul be helpful in achieveing better performance using a temp table rather than a table variable insofar as statistics updates are concerned, which do no take palce against table variables but do on temp tables
July 25, 2011 at 7:39 am
Should be filed under the "SQL Hacks" category
--
:hehe:
July 27, 2011 at 10:29 am
A table variable seems like a better solution to me
July 27, 2011 at 4:05 pm
We've already discussed that a bit Please read the full thread.
Jakub
__________________________________________________________________________________________SQLTreeo.com - My Blog and Free SSMS Productivity Add-In
July 27, 2011 at 6:19 pm
Jim Wolgamot (7/27/2011)
A table variable seems like a better solution to me
In most cases, I'd agree. It's nice to have this wonderful trick available, though.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 28, 2011 at 10:42 am
Certainly makes for a lively discussion.:cool:
Viewing 9 posts - 31 through 38 (of 38 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply
This website stores cookies on your computer.
These cookies are used to improve your website experience and provide more personalized services to you, both on this website and through other media.
To find out more about the cookies we use, see our Privacy Policy