DBCC Timewarp

Question

DBCC Timewarp

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 53 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply

Steve Jones - SSC Editor SSC Guru Points: 734449 More actions · Answer 1

And here I was thinking 137 parameters from the limitations of the datetime data to 1, 3, or 7 as the precision. Guess I should read the thread on this one!

JF1081 SSC Eights! Points: 982 More actions · Answer 2

I ~~googled~~ Topeka'ed it and the first item returned was a SQL server central thread. The link took me to the middle of the thread and I thought to myself, this is useless - there has to be real info on this somewhere. Then I read the first post in the thread.

Edit: fixed my Topeka mistake. (I wonder if I could have used timewarp to fix it?)

Gail Shaw SSC Guru Points: 1004504 More actions · Answer 3

Steve Jones - Editor (4/1/2010)
And here I was thinking 137 parameters from the limitations of the datetime data to 1, 3, or 7 as the precision.

😀 I didn't even notice that. Nice catch.

(though datetime is to 0, 3 and 7)

Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability

We walk in the dark places no others will enter
We stand on the bridge and no one may pass

SQLRNNR SSC Guru Points: 281334 More actions · Answer 4

george sibbald (4/1/2010)
D i v y a R e d d y (4/1/2010)
DBCC TIMEWARP has 137 parameter ........Is This Correct
It depends.............

That is parameter 255 of the optional set 😉

Jason...AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
_______________________________________________
I have given a name to my pain...MCM SQL Server, MVP
SQL RNNR
Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw[/url]
Learn Extended Events

SQLRNNR SSC Guru Points: 281334 More actions · Answer 5

JF1081 (4/1/2010)
I googled it and the first item returned was a SQL server central thread. The link took me to the middle of the thread and I thought to myself, this is useless - there has to be real info on this somewhere. Then I read the first post in the thread.

That is a most excellent thread. I wonder how many more people have found it now?

Jason...AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
_______________________________________________
I have given a name to my pain...MCM SQL Server, MVP
SQL RNNR
Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw[/url]
Learn Extended Events

george sibbald SSC Guru Points: 104210 More actions · Answer 6

CirquedeSQLeil (4/1/2010)
JF1081 (4/1/2010)
I googled it and the first item returned was a SQL server central thread. The link took me to the middle of the thread and I thought to myself, this is useless - there has to be real info on this somewhere. Then I read the first post in the thread.
That is a most excellent thread. I wonder how many more people have found it now?

It s the most useful thread I personally have ever been involved in. Ironic that I don't think we got the points for it because Steve went in and ran timewarp against it.

😉

---------------------------------------------------------------------

RalphWilson Mr or Mrs. 500 Points: 592 More actions · Answer 7

Apparently, you haven't upgraded to the latest TimeWarp Service Pack because that gives you another 119 parameters (including the TimeWarpResetCentury parameter), thus bringing the total available parameters up to 256.:w00t:

Ralph D. Wilson II
Development DBA

"Give me 6 hours to chop down a tree and I will spend the first 4 sharpening the ax."
A. Lincoln

john.arnott SSChampion Points: 11882 More actions · Answer 8

GilaMonster (4/1/2010)
H-122523 (4/1/2010)
Yes, indeed!, You also?
Yup. Degree in physics, haven't used it much recently (except for making up realistic-sounding explanations of non-existent SQL commands)

"Non-existent? Ah, but you sell yourself short, Gail. DBCC Timewarp does exist. You proposed it. It was built through the collaboration of several highly respected denizens of SSC. It appears as the result of a Topeka search (formerly Google). It's the subject of an SSC QOD. And with the likelihood of truth in the multiverse model, I'd say there's a SQL Server somewhere that has it fully implemented.

How much more evidence do we did of its existence?

Trey Staker SSCarpal Tunnel Points: 4796 More actions · Answer 9

john.arnott (4/1/2010)
GilaMonster (4/1/2010)
H-122523 (4/1/2010)
Yes, indeed!, You also?
Yup. Degree in physics, haven't used it much recently (except for making up realistic-sounding explanations of non-existent SQL commands)
"Non-existent? Ah, but you sell yourself short, Gail. DBCC Timewarp does exist. You proposed it. It was built through the collaboration of several highly respected denizens of SSC. It appears as the result of a Topeka search (formerly Google). It's the subject of an SSC QOD. And with the likelihood of truth in the multiverse model, I'd say there's a SQL Server somewhere that has it fully implemented.
How much more evidence do we did of its existence?

Mis use of DBCC Timewarp can form a Snow Crash that can be experienced in reality and in the multiverse. (I'm currently reading Snow Crash). Hiro Protaganist will come after you with his swords if you use optional parameters past 137.

Edited: spelling error.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Use Full Links:
KB Article from Microsoft on how to ask a question on a Forum

SQLRNNR SSC Guru Points: 281334 More actions · Answer 10

george sibbald (4/1/2010)
CirquedeSQLeil (4/1/2010)
JF1081 (4/1/2010)
I googled it and the first item returned was a SQL server central thread. The link took me to the middle of the thread and I thought to myself, this is useless - there has to be real info on this somewhere. Then I read the first post in the thread.
That is a most excellent thread. I wonder how many more people have found it now?
It s the most useful thread I personally have ever been involved in. Ironic that I don't think we got the points for it because Steve went in and ran timewarp against it.
😉

Yeah, he still needs to fix that.

Jason...AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
_______________________________________________
I have given a name to my pain...MCM SQL Server, MVP
SQL RNNR
Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw[/url]
Learn Extended Events

RalphWilson Mr or Mrs. 500 Points: 592 More actions · Answer 11

Hiro Protaganist will come after you with his swords if you use optional parameters past 137.

No worries! Although, the future release having 142 parameters was plagued by the Hiro Protaganist issue, additional future releases have dealt with this problem.

1) Optional Parameter 237 will allow the tracking of Hiro Protaganist.

2) Optional Parameter 243 will preclude Hiro Protaganist ever being

within 1 klik of your location.

3) Optional parameter 256 was added to preclude Hiro Protaganast

from ever locating your server[\u].

Ralph D. Wilson II
Development DBA

"Give me 6 hours to chop down a tree and I will spend the first 4 sharpening the ax."
A. Lincoln

Cliff Jones SSChampion Points: 10547 More actions · Answer 12

I just need to finish my Time Machine so I can go back in time and choose the correct answer.

Grumpy DBA SSChampion Points: 12368 More actions · Answer 13

Grumpy DBA

SSChampion

Points: 12368

April 1, 2010 at 12:59 pm

#1144389

Thank goodness I was able to Topeka the command...

jlennartz SSCommitted Points: 1574 More actions · Answer 14

Glad I am still old school and used Yahoo. I squeeked out the points.:hehe:

Anipaul SSC-Insane Points: 24681 More actions · Answer 15

Anipaul

SSC-Insane

Points: 24681

April 2, 2010 at 2:45 am

#1144623

It got me stumped for a while.....