April 7, 2010 at 3:59 pm
GSquared (4/7/2010)
Grant Fritchey (4/7/2010)
No celebrations for me until we hit 20,000.When The Thread has more posts than Steve, does that mean it gets to be the editor for the site?
I like that idea.
Jason...AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
_______________________________________________
I have given a name to my pain...MCM SQL Server, MVP
SQL RNNR
Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw[/url]
Learn Extended Events
April 7, 2010 at 4:00 pm
Here we go...
[font="Times New Roman"]-- RBarryYoung[/font], [font="Times New Roman"] (302)375-0451[/font] blog: MovingSQL.com, Twitter: @RBarryYoung[font="Arial Black"]
Proactive Performance Solutions, Inc. [/font][font="Verdana"] "Performance is our middle name."[/font]
April 7, 2010 at 4:01 pm
Alvin Ramard (4/7/2010)
GSquared (4/7/2010)
Alvin Ramard (4/7/2010)
Lynn, instead of him (her?), try she-he-it? 😛I always prefered "(s)he/it". Works better when you pronounce it all as one word.
That's what I meant. 😀
Yes. The thread will go skiing every Wednesday. It can't go on Thursdays because that is Steve's day.
Jason...AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
_______________________________________________
I have given a name to my pain...MCM SQL Server, MVP
SQL RNNR
Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw[/url]
Learn Extended Events
April 7, 2010 at 4:01 pm
Gift Peddie (4/7/2010)
Lynn Pettis (4/7/2010)
Gibraltar strikes again. She really needs to learn some tact.Lynn,
When I say a product comes with limitations I know the current internals of the product in comparison to another vendor's version.
Let me repeat again, the sentence below was what I was replying the OP being not current on SQL Server does not explain that sentence. I am stilling waiting for you to provide the needed technical implementation which you have not provided. So your attack is personal, please leave me alone.
I have been nothing but professional with you again don't call me names and please leave me alone.
I was thinking of SQL Server has more limitations than I had initially thought of.
Gift, your reaction to that statement was overly aggressive and lacking in tact. I don't expect manners or tact from you, but I thought I'd mention it anyway. (And yes, you should not expect manners or tact from me. Everyone else on Earth can expect those, just not you. You reap what you sow, and you have sown a huge crop of absurdities, incomprehensibilities, conspiracy theories, and rudeness.)
- Gus "GSquared", RSVP, OODA, MAP, NMVP, FAQ, SAT, SQL, DNA, RNA, UOI, IOU, AM, PM, AD, BC, BCE, USA, UN, CF, ROFL, LOL, ETC
Property of The Thread
"Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everyone agrees it's old enough to know better." - Anon
April 7, 2010 at 4:01 pm
RBarryYoung (4/7/2010)
Here we go...
Oh bother.
Jason...AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
_______________________________________________
I have given a name to my pain...MCM SQL Server, MVP
SQL RNNR
Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw[/url]
Learn Extended Events
April 7, 2010 at 4:11 pm
GSquared (4/7/2010)
Gift Peddie (4/7/2010)
Lynn Pettis (4/7/2010)
Gibraltar strikes again. She really needs to learn some tact.Lynn,
When I say a product comes with limitations I know the current internals of the product in comparison to another vendor's version.
Let me repeat again, the sentence below was what I was replying the OP being not current on SQL Server does not explain that sentence. I am stilling waiting for you to provide the needed technical implementation which you have not provided. So your attack is personal, please leave me alone.
I have been nothing but professional with you again don't call me names and please leave me alone.
I was thinking of SQL Server has more limitations than I had initially thought of.
Gift, your reaction to that statement was overly aggressive and lacking in tact. I don't expect manners or tact from you, but I thought I'd mention it anyway. (And yes, you should not expect manners or tact from me. Everyone else on Earth can expect those, just not you. You reap what you sow, and you have sown a huge crop of absurdities, incomprehensibilities, conspiracy theories, and rudeness.)
I will not dignify with an answer.
Kind regards,
Gift Peddie
April 7, 2010 at 4:23 pm
Gift Peddie (4/7/2010)
GSquared (4/7/2010)
Gift Peddie (4/7/2010)
Lynn Pettis (4/7/2010)
Gibraltar strikes again. She really needs to learn some tact.Lynn,
When I say a product comes with limitations I know the current internals of the product in comparison to another vendor's version.
Let me repeat again, the sentence below was what I was replying the OP being not current on SQL Server does not explain that sentence. I am stilling waiting for you to provide the needed technical implementation which you have not provided. So your attack is personal, please leave me alone.
I have been nothing but professional with you again don't call me names and please leave me alone.
I was thinking of SQL Server has more limitations than I had initially thought of.
Gift, your reaction to that statement was overly aggressive and lacking in tact. I don't expect manners or tact from you, but I thought I'd mention it anyway. (And yes, you should not expect manners or tact from me. Everyone else on Earth can expect those, just not you. You reap what you sow, and you have sown a huge crop of absurdities, incomprehensibilities, conspiracy theories, and rudeness.)
I will not dignify with an answer.
Two Things
1. You already dignified it with a response.
2. You made the same statement in the other thread and then came and posted the same statement in another thread. That says to the community that you are looking for an argument. At the very least it says that you are behaving contentiously.
The OP you were referencing even read it as a criticism and felt the need to apologize. Do you not see why somebody would say something about that statement?
Jason...AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
_______________________________________________
I have given a name to my pain...MCM SQL Server, MVP
SQL RNNR
Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw[/url]
Learn Extended Events
April 7, 2010 at 4:31 pm
Lynn Pettis
I remember cleaning the 9-track tape drives, also. Some of the best tapes were the 3M Black Watch, but boy were they dirty. When using those we usually had to clean the tape drives twice a shift instead of once.
Sure a smalll world I worked for 3M at the mag tape manufacturing facility ..... way back, way back, 1968 if my faulty memory serves me correctly ....
April 7, 2010 at 4:43 pm
CirquedeSQLeil (4/7/2010)
Gift Peddie (4/7/2010)
GSquared (4/7/2010)
Gift Peddie (4/7/2010)
Lynn Pettis (4/7/2010)
Gibraltar strikes again. She really needs to learn some tact.Lynn,
When I say a product comes with limitations I know the current internals of the product in comparison to another vendor's version.
Let me repeat again, the sentence below was what I was replying the OP being not current on SQL Server does not explain that sentence. I am stilling waiting for you to provide the needed technical implementation which you have not provided. So your attack is personal, please leave me alone.
I have been nothing but professional with you again don't call me names and please leave me alone.
I was thinking of SQL Server has more limitations than I had initially thought of.
Gift, your reaction to that statement was overly aggressive and lacking in tact. I don't expect manners or tact from you, but I thought I'd mention it anyway. (And yes, you should not expect manners or tact from me. Everyone else on Earth can expect those, just not you. You reap what you sow, and you have sown a huge crop of absurdities, incomprehensibilities, conspiracy theories, and rudeness.)
I will not dignify with an answer.
Two Things
1. You already dignified it with a response.
2. You made the same statement in the other thread and then came and posted the same statement in another thread. That says to the community that you are looking for an argument. At the very least it says that you are behaving contentiously.
The OP you were referencing even read it as a criticism and felt the need to apologize. Do you not see why somebody would say something about that statement?
I don't participate in this thread and have not called anybody names, so my response was appropriate to demonstrate continuity and relevance to the topic.
Kind regards,
Gift Peddie
April 7, 2010 at 4:57 pm
Gift Peddie (4/7/2010)
I don't participate in this thread and have not called anybody names, so my response was appropriate to demonstrate continuity and relevance to the topic.
Hmmm....by posting just now you just contradicted yourself and post in this thread.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Use Full Links:
KB Article from Microsoft on how to ask a question on a Forum
April 7, 2010 at 5:06 pm
Gift Peddie (4/7/2010)
CirquedeSQLeil (4/7/2010)
Gift Peddie (4/7/2010)
GSquared (4/7/2010)
Gift Peddie (4/7/2010)
Lynn Pettis (4/7/2010)
Gibraltar strikes again. She really needs to learn some tact.Lynn,
When I say a product comes with limitations I know the current internals of the product in comparison to another vendor's version.
Let me repeat again, the sentence below was what I was replying the OP being not current on SQL Server does not explain that sentence. I am stilling waiting for you to provide the needed technical implementation which you have not provided. So your attack is personal, please leave me alone.
I have been nothing but professional with you again don't call me names and please leave me alone.
I was thinking of SQL Server has more limitations than I had initially thought of.
Gift, your reaction to that statement was overly aggressive and lacking in tact. I don't expect manners or tact from you, but I thought I'd mention it anyway. (And yes, you should not expect manners or tact from me. Everyone else on Earth can expect those, just not you. You reap what you sow, and you have sown a huge crop of absurdities, incomprehensibilities, conspiracy theories, and rudeness.)
I will not dignify with an answer.
Two Things
1. You already dignified it with a response.
2. You made the same statement in the other thread and then came and posted the same statement in another thread. That says to the community that you are looking for an argument. At the very least it says that you are behaving contentiously.
The OP you were referencing even read it as a criticism and felt the need to apologize. Do you not see why somebody would say something about that statement?
I don't participate in this thread and have not called anybody names, so my response was appropriate to demonstrate continuity and relevance to the topic.
We haven't called anybody names. We have simply given nicknames to certain individuals, such as yourself, and several others that in many ways fits your SSC persona. It is obvious to many that you have a chip on your shoulder the size of Gibraltar.
And as Gus so eloquently put it:
GSquared (4/7/2010)
Gift Peddie (4/7/2010)
Lynn Pettis (4/7/2010)
Gibraltar strikes again. She really needs to learn some tact.Lynn,
When I say a product comes with limitations I know the current internals of the product in comparison to another vendor's version.
Let me repeat again, the sentence below was what I was replying the OP being not current on SQL Server does not explain that sentence. I am stilling waiting for you to provide the needed technical implementation which you have not provided. So your attack is personal, please leave me alone.
I have been nothing but professional with you again don't call me names and please leave me alone.
I was thinking of SQL Server has more limitations than I had initially thought of.
Gift, your reaction to that statement was overly aggressive and lacking in tact. I don't expect manners or tact from you, but I thought I'd mention it anyway. (And yes, you should not expect manners or tact from me. Everyone else on Earth can expect those, just not you. You reap what you sow, and you have sown a huge crop of absurdities, incomprehensibilities, conspiracy theories, and rudeness.)
I have to agree. You want to change our perceptions of you, change yourself. It will be difficult and will take time, but the rewards for making positive changes will be well worth the effort. Or, you can continue in the manner you have shown in the past, in which case you will continue to reap what you sow.
You made a judgement regarding the OP's skills and abilities based on one sentence, and you were not professional or tactful in your response. That is the fact, and you haven't even seen that it was inappropriate nor have you even taken the time to apologize to the OP.
April 7, 2010 at 5:09 pm
That last post was almost as long as some of the articles here at SSC. :Whistling:
Jason...AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
_______________________________________________
I have given a name to my pain...MCM SQL Server, MVP
SQL RNNR
Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw[/url]
Learn Extended Events
April 7, 2010 at 5:17 pm
CirquedeSQLeil (4/7/2010)
That last post was almost as long as some of the articles here at SSC. :Whistling:
And more technically accurate than a few :w00t::hehe:
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
- Theodore Roosevelt
Author of:
SQL Server Execution Plans
SQL Server Query Performance Tuning
April 7, 2010 at 5:18 pm
Lynn Pettis (4/7/2010)
Gift Peddie (4/7/2010)
CirquedeSQLeil (4/7/2010)
Gift Peddie (4/7/2010)
GSquared (4/7/2010)
Gift Peddie (4/7/2010)
Lynn Pettis (4/7/2010)
Gibraltar strikes again. She really needs to learn some tact.Lynn,
When I say a product comes with limitations I know the current internals of the product in comparison to another vendor's version.
Let me repeat again, the sentence below was what I was replying the OP being not current on SQL Server does not explain that sentence. I am stilling waiting for you to provide the needed technical implementation which you have not provided. So your attack is personal, please leave me alone.
I have been nothing but professional with you again don't call me names and please leave me alone.
I was thinking of SQL Server has more limitations than I had initially thought of.
Gift, your reaction to that statement was overly aggressive and lacking in tact. I don't expect manners or tact from you, but I thought I'd mention it anyway. (And yes, you should not expect manners or tact from me. Everyone else on Earth can expect those, just not you. You reap what you sow, and you have sown a huge crop of absurdities, incomprehensibilities, conspiracy theories, and rudeness.)
I will not dignify with an answer.
Two Things
1. You already dignified it with a response.
2. You made the same statement in the other thread and then came and posted the same statement in another thread. That says to the community that you are looking for an argument. At the very least it says that you are behaving contentiously.
The OP you were referencing even read it as a criticism and felt the need to apologize. Do you not see why somebody would say something about that statement?
I don't participate in this thread and have not called anybody names, so my response was appropriate to demonstrate continuity and relevance to the topic.
We haven't called anybody names. We have simply given nicknames to certain individuals, such as yourself, and several others that in many ways fits your SSC persona. It is obvious to many that you have a chip on your shoulder the size of Gibraltar.
And as Gus so eloquently put it:
GSquared (4/7/2010)
Gift Peddie (4/7/2010)
Lynn Pettis (4/7/2010)
Gibraltar strikes again. She really needs to learn some tact.Lynn,
When I say a product comes with limitations I know the current internals of the product in comparison to another vendor's version.
Let me repeat again, the sentence below was what I was replying the OP being not current on SQL Server does not explain that sentence. I am stilling waiting for you to provide the needed technical implementation which you have not provided. So your attack is personal, please leave me alone.
I have been nothing but professional with you again don't call me names and please leave me alone.
I was thinking of SQL Server has more limitations than I had initially thought of.
Gift, your reaction to that statement was overly aggressive and lacking in tact. I don't expect manners or tact from you, but I thought I'd mention it anyway. (And yes, you should not expect manners or tact from me. Everyone else on Earth can expect those, just not you. You reap what you sow, and you have sown a huge crop of absurdities, incomprehensibilities, conspiracy theories, and rudeness.)
I have to agree. You want to change our perceptions of you, change yourself. It will be difficult and will take time, but the rewards for making positive changes will be well worth the effort. Or, you can continue in the manner you have shown in the past, in which case you will continue to reap what you sow.
You made a judgement regarding the OP's skills and abilities based on one sentence, and you were not professional or tactful in your response. That is the fact, and you haven't even seen that it was inappropriate nor have you even taken the time to apologize to the OP.
Thanks to the privileged.
Kind regards,
Gift Peddie
April 7, 2010 at 5:19 pm
Grant Fritchey (4/7/2010)
CirquedeSQLeil (4/7/2010)
That last post was almost as long as some of the articles here at SSC. :Whistling:And more technically accurate than a few :w00t::hehe:
I almost got bit by the F5 bug. Luckily I caught it first:-D
Buahahaha.
Chuckle chuckle.
Jason...AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
_______________________________________________
I have given a name to my pain...MCM SQL Server, MVP
SQL RNNR
Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw[/url]
Learn Extended Events
Viewing 15 posts - 14,056 through 14,070 (of 66,815 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply