At the first job I had as a DBA, I had to build a new server. This was in the days of SQL Server 4.2, and I was combination DBA, sysadmin, and general help desk at a small company. With a software developer consultant, we ran some tests on various machines and then ordered a collection of parts from Compaq. Back in this time, they would only customer parts of the server. We unpacked our boxes with the server, extra drive bay, various SCSI drives, and extra RAM. We assembled and tested the machine and eventually put it into production.

In the years since then, I got out of the hardware business and left that to others. For awhile I worked in organizations with IT staff dedicated to building machines, but at some point we stopped doing that. The growth of VMWare and other hypervisors changed the paradigm for most organizations. For more than a decade, all the servers I've connected to are virtual machines running on hardware that my employer or a cloud provider owns and manages as a node in a cluster.

Early on there were concerns about the overhead of using hypervisors and virtual machines. When many early workloads moved to VMs, lots of organizations left database servers on bare metal to squeeze every bit of performance out of the system that was possible. Over the years, improvements in hypervisors as well as the software used to connect storage and networks together seem to have rendered those conversations obsolete.

Or have they?

Today I'm wondering if any of you still have servers on bare metal. Are there systems that you continue to install the OS and database server software directly on the hardware? Or are there systems where you still ensure that there is only one VM, the database server VM, on a hardware node?

The cloud has changed a lot of these conversations, since everything is a VM. Even many local data centers will rent you a VM, something that wasn't possible when we first moved SQL Server Central out of a friend's basement into a co-location facility. Back then we owned our servers and I installed them in data center racks. I would like to think we'd have moved our site to the cloud in some way over time, though maybe not. Maybe I'd still be managing a couple servers in a room in Denver.

Are any of your organizations still running legacy systems in the same way you would have in 1999? Let us know today.