The Final Word on SQL Server 2005 SP2?

, 2007-04-11

Bob Ward posted on the PSS SQL Server Engineers blog a fairly long post on SP2 and the hotfixes thereafter:

  SQL Server 2005 Service Pack 2 (SP2) Re-release and post fixes explained

So with all the confusion, what version should you be at? Bob posts that in his summary:

So as you can see from this summary, after applying the critical updates you

should be on either build 9.00.3054 or

9.00.3159. I hope you find this information helpful and I hope

the details and summary will help you decide how to proceed with installation of

these fixes.

Read the whole post as to the details and what fixes you may need to grab.

Technorati Tags: SQL Server |

Microsoft SQL Server |

SQL Server 2005 |

SQL Server 2005 Service Pack 2

Rate

Share

Share

Rate

Related content

Database Mirroring FAQ: Can a 2008 SQL instance be used as the witness for a 2005 database mirroring setup?

Question: Can a 2008 SQL instance be used as the witness for a 2005 database mirroring setup? This question was sent to me via email. My reply follows. Can a 2008 SQL instance be used as the witness for a 2005 database mirroring setup? Databases to be mirrored are currently running on 2005 SQL instances but will be upgraded to 2008 SQL in the near future.

2009-02-23

1,567 reads

Networking - Part 4

You may want to read Part 1 , Part 2 , and Part 3 before continuing. This time around I'd like to talk about social networking. We'll start with social networking. Facebook, MySpace, and Twitter are all good examples of using technology to let...

2009-02-17

1,530 reads

Speaking at Community Events - More Thoughts

Last week I posted Speaking at Community Events - Time to Raise the Bar?, a first cut at talking about to what degree we should require experience for speakers at events like SQLSaturday as well as when it might be appropriate to add additional focus/limitations on the presentations that are accepted. I've got a few more thoughts on the topic this week, and I look forward to your comments.

2009-02-13

360 reads