SQL Server 2008 R2 SP2 CU11

, 2014-02-21

On February 17, 2014, Microsoft released SQL Server 2008 R2 SP2 CU11, which is Build 10.50.4302. This cumulative update has twelve hotfixes in the public fix list.

If you are running SQL Server 2008 R2, the only supported Service Pack level is SP2. Both SP1 and RTM have been retired. This means that if your build number is less than 10.50.4000, you are on an unsupported Service Pack and this cumulative update will not work for you.

I think it is a little ridiculous that we don’t have a SQL Server 2008 SP3 yet. Based on the recent public hints from Microsoft, there might not be a SQL Server 2008 R2 SP3, before this version of the product goes out on Mainstream Support on July 8, 2014.

If you have any thoughts about this, I ask you to take a minute and vote for my Connect item about Service Packs, and also leave a comment. Thanks!

Filed under: Cumulative Update, SQL Server 2008 R2 Tagged: SQL Server 2008 R2 SP2 CU11

Rate

Share

Share

Rate

Related content

Database Mirroring FAQ: Can a 2008 SQL instance be used as the witness for a 2005 database mirroring setup?

Question: Can a 2008 SQL instance be used as the witness for a 2005 database mirroring setup? This question was sent to me via email. My reply follows. Can a 2008 SQL instance be used as the witness for a 2005 database mirroring setup? Databases to be mirrored are currently running on 2005 SQL instances but will be upgraded to 2008 SQL in the near future.

2009-02-23

1,567 reads

Networking - Part 4

You may want to read Part 1 , Part 2 , and Part 3 before continuing. This time around I'd like to talk about social networking. We'll start with social networking. Facebook, MySpace, and Twitter are all good examples of using technology to let...

2009-02-17

1,530 reads

Speaking at Community Events - More Thoughts

Last week I posted Speaking at Community Events - Time to Raise the Bar?, a first cut at talking about to what degree we should require experience for speakers at events like SQLSaturday as well as when it might be appropriate to add additional focus/limitations on the presentations that are accepted. I've got a few more thoughts on the topic this week, and I look forward to your comments.

2009-02-13

360 reads