SQL Server 2008 end of support

, 2018-12-21

2018 is about to end. In the case you didn't know or haven't heard, the extended support for SQL Server 2008 (and R2) reaches to an end in 2019.
This beloved version (lets be honest, is like windows XP for the database world) was launched on 8/6/2008, so that means that is a 10 years old technology, with the same time as the backberry and much other devices that almost no one uses this days, which were great, but trought be told, compared with Today's gadgets they are way behind although it marked a milestone to what we have now you would preffer something better for you, isn't it?
So what does the end of support means?
Basically it means, that Microsoft wouldn't offer any type of support for that version of SQL Server, which can be translated to:
  • No new Service packs will be released
  • No new cumulative updates will be developed
And what does that means to me? Why should I care?
If I depend of any type of regulation or my environment holds any type of certification (PCI-DSS, HIPPA, etc.) it means that I would be flagged as "non-compliant" because it requires that any software that I use is still with support of the company that provide it.
It means, that I won't be getting updates anymore, if any new vulnerability is found for this product, it is most likely that I won't be getting a patch to remediate it. Also, all the repositories will eventually be removed, so even if the package I need was developed and for some reason I didn't applied, and then I look for it, it is most likely that I won't be able to find it, like is now the case for SQL 2005.
So what options do I have?
  1. Extended support: You can pay for extended support, this applies only if you have Software Assurance or Enterprise agreement and is only if you need to raise a ticket with Microsoft asking for support but not to resolve bug fixes and this extended support is Expensive, really really expensive.
  2. Azure: Microsoft can offers the extended support for up to 3 years, if you move your SQL Server as a VM in Azure, with that you can still get support without paying the extended support fee like if you stay on-premises.
  1. Upgrade: The best option is that you upgrade your environment, if you really need to stay on-premises, you can plan a migration in your own data center, however you can also plan to upgrade and take the new benefits of Azure in the different flavors it has to offer (Azure SQL, Azure Managed instance or VM with SQL Server)
Does it really worths the effort?
Absolutelly, the newer versions not only run faster but it also offers more features to secure your data, it also integrates monitoring tools and auto-tunning plus now you can run it in all different platforms not only with Windows.
So if you don't have your migration planned already, what are you waiting?

Rate

Share

Share

Rate

Related content

Database Mirroring FAQ: Can a 2008 SQL instance be used as the witness for a 2005 database mirroring setup?

Question: Can a 2008 SQL instance be used as the witness for a 2005 database mirroring setup? This question was sent to me via email. My reply follows. Can a 2008 SQL instance be used as the witness for a 2005 database mirroring setup? Databases to be mirrored are currently running on 2005 SQL instances but will be upgraded to 2008 SQL in the near future.

2009-02-23

1,567 reads

Networking - Part 4

You may want to read Part 1 , Part 2 , and Part 3 before continuing. This time around I'd like to talk about social networking. We'll start with social networking. Facebook, MySpace, and Twitter are all good examples of using technology to let...

2009-02-17

1,530 reads

Speaking at Community Events - More Thoughts

Last week I posted Speaking at Community Events - Time to Raise the Bar?, a first cut at talking about to what degree we should require experience for speakers at events like SQLSaturday as well as when it might be appropriate to add additional focus/limitations on the presentations that are accepted. I've got a few more thoughts on the topic this week, and I look forward to your comments.

2009-02-13

360 reads