SNESSUG October Meeting
The Southern New England SQL Server Users Group’s October meeting was a bit sparsely attended with 7 attendees. The sponsor...
2009-10-15
706 reads
The Southern New England SQL Server Users Group’s October meeting was a bit sparsely attended with 7 attendees. The sponsor...
2009-10-15
706 reads
Among the things I’m experimenting with this quarter is changing my book reviews to include an affiliate link to Amazon....
2009-10-14
316 reads
Some people just love to talk. I guess I’m one of those people. I admit it. But there is a...
2009-10-14
429 reads
As I work on moving a large system with multiple database servers from a 27TB SAN to a single database...
2009-10-14
811 reads
Hi,
Today while working on query analyzer found very interesting thing about security.
My sql server A is running with service account...
2009-10-14
621 reads
You should get an email if you’re eligible to vote with a subject line beginning with ‘Vote for the 2010/2011...
2009-10-14
290 reads
La liste des fichiers restaurés devrait se trouver dans le répertoire suivant :
\\ServeurDeBD\Disque$\DirSauvegardesProd\DBlog\
Dès que la restauration a été complétée, nous...
2009-10-14
816 reads
My second guest editorial is up at SQL Server Central. These are fun to do (especially the video) even though they’re...
2009-10-14
556 reads
I’m out of the office today, in Austin, TX (yee-haw!) at the Stack Overflow Dev Days – Austin. There are a...
2009-10-14
762 reads
The fourth annual SQL Down Under Code Camp was held at Charles Sturt University in Wagga Wagga, Australia this past...
2009-10-14
383 reads
By SQLPals
Why sys.fn_dblog Is Undocumented And Why It's Still There Why sys.fn_dblog...
When I put together the invitation for T-SQL Tuesday #202, I wasn't sure what...
By Steve Jones
My life has some crazy travel stretches for sure. Between speaking, office visits, customer...
Comments posted to this topic are about the item Implementing Type 4 Slowly Changing...
Comments posted to this topic are about the item The Disabled Index
Comments posted to this topic are about the item Server-Level Table sizes
I run this code on SQL Server 2022.
CREATE TABLE Drink
(
drinkid INT NOT NULL
CONSTRAINT DrinkPK PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED,
drinkname VARCHAR(20),
rating NUMERIC(2, 1)
)
GO
INSERT INTO Drink
(
drinkid,
drinkname,
rating
)
VALUES
(1, 'Margarita', 4.5),
(2, 'Mojito', 4.3),
(3, 'Old Fashioned', 4.7),
(4, 'Martini', 4.4),
(5, 'Cosmopolitan', 4.2)
GO
ALTER INDEX drinkpk ON dbo.drink DISABLE
GO
SELECT * FROM dbo.Drink
GO
What is the result? See possible answers