Blog Post

Encrypting AlwaysOn Availability Group Transport- Some thoughts!

,

Transport security for AlwaysOn Availability Group is an interesting topic, and any day it’s a topic which is debatable.

The transport security involves encryption of packets exchanged between the servers involved, and for AlwaysOn AG the encryption is made possible on the Hadr_endpoint.

By default, its encrypted using AES standard. If you are interested to know more about AES, then please ref here.

Here is the code to create the Hadr_endpoint:

USE [master]
GO
/****** Object: Endpoint [Hadr_endpoint] Script Date: 1/27/2016 3:25:01 PM ******/CREATE ENDPOINT [Hadr_endpoint] 
 STATE=STARTED
 AS TCP (LISTENER_PORT = 5022, LISTENER_IP = ALL)
 FOR DATA_MIRRORING (ROLE = ALL, AUTHENTICATION = WINDOWS NEGOTIATE
, ENCRYPTION = REQUIRED ALGORITHM AES)
GO

This means that by default the end point will ensure that data is encrypted when its sent over. The end point can only connect to end points which uses encryption.

You also have an option to turn off encryption. Yes, you heard that correct. You have an option to disable encryption by using the ALTER END POINT command.

If you closely observe the ALTER command for end point, there are 3 options:

[ , ENCRYPTION = { DISABLED | {{SUPPORTED | REQUIRED } [ ALGORITHM { RC4 | AES | AES RC4 | RC4 AES } ] } ]

Disabling the end point is where I have some thoughts –

Think about this scenario:

What if you have a very well secured network infrastructure, and there is no way something bad like a sniffing can happen. In that case is there a need for turning on encryption?

Yes, as stated earlier this is a debatable topic and the best answer to this question will be “It depends”.

The best answer for this question is to understand the overhead of AES encryption (AES encryption is usually combined with padding) to the data transfer, and to analyze if there are any potential benefits by disabling it.

There might be some edge cases where in disabling encryption in a controlled fashion yielded benefits.

This definitely is food for thought, and I’m really interested to know your thoughts around this.

Thanks for reading, and keep watching this space for more!

Rate

You rated this post out of 5. Change rating

Share

Share

Rate

You rated this post out of 5. Change rating