Viewing 15 posts - 661 through 675 (of 769 total)
jcrawf02 (10/15/2008)
jpowers (10/15/2008)
Steve Jones - Editor (10/15/2008)
October 15, 2008 at 11:07 am
The entire meltdown, crash, implosion or whatever you want to call it came about and could have been avoided but for 1 simple human principal; the 'Me First' principal. ...
October 14, 2008 at 12:34 pm
Using the text MSSQLSERVER worked for me as well.
Maybe I'm being too harsh or picky buit it seems to me that if a product (the upgrade advisor in this scenario)...
October 13, 2008 at 3:27 pm
Gail,
Thank you for the reply and info. I'm reading thru more in BOL about Indexes in general but it's not made very clear or at least not easily clear,...
October 13, 2008 at 10:50 am
OK here is one for you with regards to the table being to small.
I am seeing the same problem on a table that has millions of rows and is hundreads...
October 9, 2008 at 10:10 am
Thanks for the info Matt; I would have never thought of that even though it makes a lot of sense.
October 9, 2008 at 8:18 am
Thanks Gail! Although at this point, with as many of my posts as you have answered, I can't help but wonder if I should ask for a billing rate...
October 2, 2008 at 9:11 am
sblock (9/30/2008)
September 30, 2008 at 4:31 pm
Steve -
The problem with sticking with hosting discussions of the articles on their home site is that often those sites either offer no discussion forum/hosting or if they do,...
September 29, 2008 at 3:05 pm
Wow! I had no clue that was there. Thanks for pinting this out Steve!
Now if we could just get teh orginal post to show; perhaps in...
September 26, 2008 at 1:33 pm
Thanks to each who have replied so far. Currently I am testing this using the TNYINT data type and I now feel better seeing others respond with a suggestion...
September 25, 2008 at 8:54 am
I second that and would add that it would be best if when replying you could see at a minimum, the original post and the post you clicked Reply on...
September 25, 2008 at 8:43 am
Big thanks to all! I knew I remembered seeing it somewhere.
September 24, 2008 at 12:42 pm
Hmmm... Have you considered table partitioning? Partition on the base numbers for the transactions and then, under the covers, it will be like each transaction type has its own table....
September 23, 2008 at 2:13 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 661 through 675 (of 769 total)