Viewing 15 posts - 11,236 through 11,250 (of 39,909 total)
There's no "following" that explains what you see.
However likely if you can't kill the process, you'll need to restart SQL Server.
April 7, 2014 at 8:59 am
I didn't forget licensing costs, but they may or may not apply to you. Plenty of companies don't stress over adding another SQL Server, and plenty more don't stress about...
April 4, 2014 at 12:33 pm
chrisn-585491 (4/4/2014)
April 4, 2014 at 8:36 am
dwain.c (4/3/2014)
Many thanks to Steve for syndicating my blogs on SSC:And my apologies for making you work so hard at it.
You are welcome and good stuff. Check it out, everyone
April 3, 2014 at 6:42 pm
Revenant (4/3/2014)
Sean Lange (4/3/2014)
Greg Edwards-268690 (4/3/2014)
it was clear they had no idea what they wanted or needed.But finish it by Friday.
This is an everyday occurrence at my job.
That's OK as...
April 3, 2014 at 2:10 pm
It's likely on your end, but please send a note to the webmaster at this domain with the email you are subscribed from.
April 3, 2014 at 10:10 am
If nothing popped up then it didn't detect anything. You can change it and if there are issues, then you can change it back. It's not a physical change.
April 2, 2014 at 10:56 am
I tend to prefer fewer indexes, but with composites and includes, but as Gail and Grant mentioned, those have to be based on your queries. There's no way to decide...
April 2, 2014 at 10:37 am
I'd keep things in the db. Use a synonym or three part naming to do this and execute it in the database. Make sure you include error handling if the...
April 2, 2014 at 10:36 am
Lynn Pettis (4/2/2014)
April 2, 2014 at 10:34 am
The big issues are keyword clashes. Something allowed in SQL Server 2000 (v8) might be disallowed in 2008. I think the outer joins, with non ANSI syntax might be an...
April 2, 2014 at 10:33 am
Grant Fritchey (4/1/2014)
GilaMonster (4/1/2014)
April 2, 2014 at 10:13 am
Ray Herring (4/2/2014)
In my case...
April 2, 2014 at 10:12 am
Viewing 15 posts - 11,236 through 11,250 (of 39,909 total)