Viewing 15 posts - 4,876 through 4,890 (of 39,824 total)
Heh... performance is second only to accuracy so I'll have to disagree with...
October 1, 2018 at 9:56 am
October 1, 2018 at 9:55 am
October 1, 2018 at 9:54 am
Programming / development is made much easier by this as well. ...
October 1, 2018 at 8:31 am
October 1, 2018 at 8:27 am
I wouldn't think data is the issue, as error trapping should handle this if you have concerned. You can look for the error and redact the message.
September 28, 2018 at 7:07 am
Really interesting question, thanks...
September 28, 2018 at 7:05 am
Hold off. The submission needs work. If I don't get an updated one in a week, I'll post here.
September 27, 2018 at 12:01 pm
September 27, 2018 at 11:13 am
backup has never interrupted the log chain. Only the differential chain is impacted with a full backup. Copy only is for avoiding differential issues.
September 27, 2018 at 10:19 am
Yes, 16 is small, though how much data? If you have <16GB of data, maybe it's fine and you need to worry more about code and indexing.
September 27, 2018 at 10:18 am
There is a good explanation here. It's not 0 byte for nulls: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3793022/how-do-you-get-to-limits-of-8060-bytes-per-row-and-8000-per-varchar-nvarchar/3793265#3793265
The sparse column thing is for fixed width fields, like int, tinyint,etc
September 27, 2018 at 9:57 am
September 27, 2018 at 9:28 am
Viewing 15 posts - 4,876 through 4,890 (of 39,824 total)