Viewing 15 posts - 35,566 through 35,580 (of 39,957 total)
I do not believe you can delete Meta Data Services from the EM snap in. Not sure it's a good idea. Why do you want to delete this?
you can right...
January 23, 2004 at 10:05 am
Rename the Windows server.
Inside SQL run:
sp_dropserver serverb
sp_addserver servera, local
January 23, 2004 at 9:58 am
Developers always think it's a minimal change and I can easily back it out. What if your syntax (SQL) is correct, but you miss a join and implment a cross...
January 22, 2004 at 10:04 am
Are you trying to install server? Because you will have connection issues, I believe with W2K Pro. I thought there was a limit.
You can install Personal edition, which is licensed...
January 22, 2004 at 10:01 am
There are other ways to do this, but they result in complicated SQL that is hard to read, write, adn work with. Kevin's solution is the best method and if...
January 21, 2004 at 8:17 am
While Brian has the best advice fro this, I typically leave the domain admins in because they are a small select group (here) and know better than to work with...
January 21, 2004 at 8:13 am
For a one time shot I use backup restore. Or for something like refreshing QA.
January 21, 2004 at 8:11 am
Be sure you check disabled account, computer restrictions, hours etc. in the account properties.
January 21, 2004 at 8:10 am
You don't really want to use the timestamp type, rather a datetime marked at the time or some flag that indicates where they were. I'd post the data and insert/...
January 20, 2004 at 12:33 pm
I like Chris' suggestion and would use that.
January 20, 2004 at 12:07 pm
I'm not sure this is available in this extended stored procedure.
January 20, 2004 at 11:56 am
It's a stored procedure, so an insert..exec will do it
create table mytest( drive varchar(2), mb numeric)
insert mytest exec master..xp_fixeddrives
select * from mytest
drop table mytest
January 20, 2004 at 11:55 am
I'm sure they are aware, but this is the easiest way for them to deploy BOL.
January 20, 2004 at 10:27 am
I don't see why this wouldn't work. I haven't tried it, but the instances should be separate. One will have to be named, of course.
January 20, 2004 at 10:24 am
I've noticed as well. It's on our list.
January 20, 2004 at 10:21 am
Viewing 15 posts - 35,566 through 35,580 (of 39,957 total)