Viewing 15 posts - 35,176 through 35,190 (of 39,720 total)
Total is what it's using, Target is what it wants. If this is different, then there will be more swapping to disk and performance can be affected. It could appear...
February 25, 2004 at 8:05 pm
I believe you can script this from EM. right click the database, generate scripts and check the permissiosn item.
Note: the logins and users must already be the same on the...
February 25, 2004 at 1:57 pm
I'd double check that it is truly recreated correctly on the right table, same owner, etc.
February 25, 2004 at 1:51 pm
February 25, 2004 at 1:47 pm
I'd guess your SP is corrupted somehow. Can you reapply it?
February 25, 2004 at 1:42 pm
Check that the ODBC connection is configured to use Window Auth. I believe it is from this message you are posting.
It is a windows credentials not being passed through problem....
February 25, 2004 at 1:41 pm
Good for you! That's one of the few battles that I will constantly fight.
No sa for developers ![]()
February 25, 2004 at 9:38 am
Have you run a dbcc checkdb to rule out physical errors on these two?
February 25, 2004 at 9:33 am
BTW, you want Auto Create Statistics and Auto Update Statistics on unless they are causing a problem. Now that I'm thinking of it, I'm not sure how to monitor that....
February 24, 2004 at 3:58 pm
After Frank's diatribe, I'm not sure my input is needed, but here's a couple thoughts.
1.In SQL 2000, dynamic SQL can be cached as well, so there is slightly less of...
February 24, 2004 at 3:35 pm
It should also rebuild at its original size when the server is restarted.
The other item is that your .ldf is used for transactions, but committed transactions are removed at a...
February 24, 2004 at 12:09 pm
good comments and a great article. One other thing that I think should be mentioned first is that the user account should not be SA, but rather a limited rights account....
February 24, 2004 at 11:58 am
SQL Server 6.5 is no longer supported by MS.http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=fh;%5Bln%5D;LifeSrvr
February 24, 2004 at 10:55 am
Are statistics being updated? This could cause things to run slower. Has the data changed much?
Does a recompile of a sproc make it run faster?
February 24, 2004 at 10:48 am
Also keep in mind that defragmenting on the hard drive doesn't necessarily defragment your tables. You can have fragmented tables insdie the .mdf files. dbcc showcontig can help you here.
February 24, 2004 at 10:35 am
Viewing 15 posts - 35,176 through 35,190 (of 39,720 total)