Viewing 15 posts - 23,776 through 23,790 (of 39,961 total)
You could use a hash.
Otherwise, there isn't a great way to do this. Typically you do not create a unique index on an encrypted field.
May 27, 2009 at 10:56 am
As mentioned you need to shrink the log, but you also need to set up log backups, figure out how large to leave the log, and monitor things.
May 27, 2009 at 10:47 am
I'd use Jeffrey's suggestion. You can't use a variable in the 3 or 4 part naming scheme.
May 27, 2009 at 10:39 am
Hard to stay in the top 5. Someone can answer a few hundred questions in a couple days and get up there.
May 27, 2009 at 10:26 am
If you (ya'll) want to write a book together or separately, Tony Davis of Simple-Talk is always looking for some to use in promotions. He has gotten them in print...
May 27, 2009 at 9:57 am
Sample data of what is in the tables, and what the result should be. Not what you are getting with the query that doesn't work.
May 27, 2009 at 8:55 am
Simon was once trying to sell SQL Compare to a company and they questioned the value. He pulled out two phone books from different years and 100lb note. Said if...
May 27, 2009 at 8:54 am
Sounds like you need more drives. Also, storing backups on the same physical disk as data is a mistake. If it goes, you lose data.
Make sure you have enough space...
May 27, 2009 at 8:36 am
I thought an index was a scale for measurement. Isn't that why it's in all those performance questions?
May 27, 2009 at 8:19 am
Use CTRL+F5 to reload the page without cache. Windows caches the page a little too much sometimes.
May 26, 2009 at 2:28 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 23,776 through 23,790 (of 39,961 total)