Viewing 15 posts - 20,146 through 20,160 (of 39,903 total)
anthony_merriwether (4/19/2010)
April 19, 2010 at 11:25 am
You are getting confused here about security context. When you log into SQL Server as "sa", SQL Server is a self-contained system. It has no knowledge, or even rights, to...
April 19, 2010 at 11:22 am
Bhuvnesh (4/19/2010)
@steve-2Difference between suser_sname() and suser_name() ?
Not sure. I think there is a difference depending on your security connection and setup (AD v non-AD, group v...
April 19, 2010 at 11:19 am
Sorry, I think I typed too many S's. Old habit from tracking machines too often.
suser_name() should return the security context.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-US/library/ms187934%28v=SQL.90%29.aspx
April 19, 2010 at 8:10 am
April 19, 2010 at 7:13 am
Is the file name the same every time? Same location? Or do you need to somehow read what's on the FTP site and then programmatically pick a file to retreive?
April 18, 2010 at 9:08 pm
That actual rendering of the report is likely the smallest part of the time. As mentioned by the ninja, you need to tune the queries. So focus on tuning those.
If...
April 18, 2010 at 6:52 am
Grant Fritchey (4/18/2010)
lmu92 (4/18/2010)
Is Google down?I usually is... or maybe all those millions I pay for exclusive rights to use it is the thing?
I don't usually do this, but...
April 18, 2010 at 6:47 am
If you have SQL 2000 installed, you cannot install a default instance of SQL 2005. You would install a named instance, or upgrade your SQL 2000 instance to 2005.
April 17, 2010 at 11:30 am
That was a good catch. Looks like I need to write a good one pager on this and include all information
April 17, 2010 at 10:50 am
Thanks for the update. Good to have the answer listed here for others.
April 17, 2010 at 10:39 am
The "let me google that for you"
April 17, 2010 at 10:38 am
You choose where you install each version. The named instance of 2005 will have nothing to do with the 2000 instance you have installed. If you upgrade, it will keep...
April 17, 2010 at 10:29 am
Wayne,
Hadn't seen that before, but it's great. I bookmarked it to use it for some question.
April 17, 2010 at 9:39 am
Yeah, those dates from Jason sound right. We upgraded from 4.2 to 6.0 to start a dev project, and then about 6 months in 6.5 came out. I don't remember...
April 17, 2010 at 9:39 am
Viewing 15 posts - 20,146 through 20,160 (of 39,903 total)