Viewing 15 posts - 18,616 through 18,630 (of 39,833 total)
256kb, should be in SQL, above 1MB, should be in the file system. I think it's a gray area in between.
You might reduce some SQL resources/IO from a large file,...
August 18, 2010 at 10:15 am
If you can be sure that it will always mean N/A, you could use it. Alternatively, you could use a code, something like 99989 to mean electric car.
It's how you...
August 18, 2010 at 9:10 am
George has good reasons. Shrinking log files is mostly a waste of resources if done regularly. It is really there for fixing specific problems from one-off situations.
August 18, 2010 at 9:04 am
I agree with David that TableDiff can work. It's a little work on your side, but not a crazy amount. Red Gate and Apex tools are low cost, are tested,...
August 18, 2010 at 9:00 am
I believe that data is moved to other files in the filegroup, round robin style, and then the file is emptied.
August 18, 2010 at 8:58 am
It could be N/A, but that implies a specific meaning. Using NULL there as a placeholder works, but you are assigning a value to NULL. I prefer to keep it...
August 18, 2010 at 8:57 am
Let us know if you figure it out. Would be a nice piece of info to keep handy.
August 18, 2010 at 8:53 am
Sorry, forgot to include a link to help: http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic854028-148-1.aspx
August 18, 2010 at 8:23 am
You would need to read the XML and split into rows. There is a task in SSIS that can help here. Is this a one time thing or a repeatable...
August 18, 2010 at 8:23 am
If you shrink regularly, you're creating fragmentation in your tables. Remove that from your system. If it grows beyond 50MB, determine why. don't just shrink.
August 18, 2010 at 8:22 am
You must have your DR version at SQL Server 2008 R2. It is an upgrade from SQL Server 2008. You can have a second instance on your laptop with this...
August 18, 2010 at 8:19 am
Is this SQL 2000? I don't believe EXECUTE AS works in 2000.
AFAIK, in 2000 you had to be the owner of the table for truncate.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa260621%28SQL.80%29.aspx
August 18, 2010 at 8:18 am
There is a master/target type of relationship for managing jobs in SQL Agent, but I have never liked it.
I have preferred to have each box manage it's own backups, and...
August 18, 2010 at 8:16 am
Is there something confusing about this: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa258824%28v=SQL.80%29.aspx
August 18, 2010 at 8:13 am
AFAIK, back to FoxPro for DOS, it used DBF files for storing data, and .IDX by convention for indexes. I don't know what those are.
August 18, 2010 at 8:12 am
Viewing 15 posts - 18,616 through 18,630 (of 39,833 total)