Viewing 15 posts - 17,131 through 17,145 (of 39,831 total)
I would not make those 12 a clustered index. These 12 columns will be in every single nonclustered index as well, so they will all be wide.
I would lean towards...
January 5, 2011 at 4:24 pm
Feel free. Looking for a nice short concise reference to give people, and use as a link in one of my talks 😉
January 5, 2011 at 8:30 am
If this is for school/homework, you should be working through some of this yourself. The scenarios you present are not that difficult, and some experimentation should help you.
If this is...
January 5, 2011 at 7:45 am
Since Red Gate Software (my employer) makes a product called "SQL Backup", I'd go with native/litespeed as the naming for the backup type.
Ultimately I don't think it's critical to know...
January 5, 2011 at 7:37 am
You should be able to move your partitioned table to a new filegroup by moving the clustered index (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms175905%28SQL.90%29.aspx)
I like the idea of moving this to a separate filegroup, and...
January 5, 2011 at 7:29 am
Tony Savoie (1/5/2011)
"Database administrators often disable transaction logs for fear of affecting...
January 5, 2011 at 7:13 am
Apologies, apparently something broke over the holidays. I'll get someone to look at this ASAP.
January 5, 2011 at 6:55 am
I think Ben has some good advice here. I don't know that those two versions conflict anywhere, but the client version is what really matters. The server drivers matter at...
January 4, 2011 at 8:40 pm
You can snapshot a publication, or at least I believe you can. If you have a pub with ONLY stored procs that can work.
You might be able to script out,...
January 4, 2011 at 11:40 am
GilaMonster (1/4/2011)
Koen (da-zero) (1/4/2011)
GilaMonster (1/4/2011)
<sigh> Talking plagiarism. He really should know better...http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic1042151-2799-1.aspx
Waw, LutzM's reply is really brutal 😀
(but I'm thinking the same thing)
Missed it when Steve cleaned up. Someone enlighten...
January 4, 2011 at 11:30 am
From here: http://www.cpuid.com/softwares/cpu-z.html
January 4, 2011 at 10:10 am
Nope, I had this file
cpu-z_1.56-64bits-en.zip
January 4, 2011 at 10:09 am
Gail is correct. While it will "act" like a 2005 database, the physical structure changes, and the 2008R2 engine runs against it. The code in interpreted as though it were...
January 4, 2011 at 10:00 am
Viewing 15 posts - 17,131 through 17,145 (of 39,831 total)