Viewing 15 posts - 6,991 through 7,005 (of 7,608 total)
You also need to verify that the log LUNs are RAID10 and the data LUNs are RAID5 (typically that is the best performance).
If you're going to put both tempdb mdf...
December 24, 2012 at 9:31 am
SQLSACT (12/19/2012)
Why does the 1st query return duplicates and the 2nd query doesn't?
... the 2nd query having a stream aggregate. Why is this being added?
Thanks
The first query does a JOIN;...
December 21, 2012 at 2:52 pm
Don't see anything magical to let you get rid of any of the lookup joins :-).
There typically won't be, so all you can do is tune the lookups as much...
December 21, 2012 at 2:11 pm
If you do need a prefix (and/or suffix), you can do this:
CREATE TABLE dbo.tablename (
prefix char(3) DEFAULT 'ABC',
ident int IDENTITY(1, 1) NOT...
December 21, 2012 at 1:34 pm
I would still like further info on the indexes. Please post the results of this query run from that db (a subset of what I use to analyze index...
December 21, 2012 at 1:23 pm
string_column LIKE '%''%'
or:
CHARINDEX('''', string_column) > 0
December 19, 2012 at 2:59 pm
Yes.
Typically a LEFT OUTER JOIN is used for that.
Say you're inserting names and want to avoid inserting one that's already in the table:
INSERT INTO dbo.names_table ( name )
SELECT wt.name
FROM dbo.work_table...
December 18, 2012 at 10:13 am
If you're 100% sure that no group_id will ever be more than one type, then that looks OK.
You probably want to consider using an IDENTITY column to automatically assign one...
December 18, 2012 at 10:10 am
Interesting too is that an empty string does not work for decimal values:
SELECT 1.1+''
But it again does work for dates:
SELECT CAST('' as datetime)
Ah the wonders of SQL -- "wonder why...
December 18, 2012 at 10:03 am
44 out of 48 is definitely too high. Keep in mind that the OS needs some RAM to manage the RAM itself.
Assuming no other software using significant RAM is...
December 18, 2012 at 10:00 am
PiMané (12/18/2012)
ScottPletcher (12/17/2012)
December 18, 2012 at 9:17 am
Since you have to ALTER columns only one at a time (why, MS, why??), I'd create a new table and INSERT every row into it, converting every column at one...
December 17, 2012 at 4:00 pm
sp_MSforeachdb is convenient, but it has huge overhead and is probably overkill for what you need.
You can use sp_executesql to return a value from dynamic SQL, albeit that it's not...
December 17, 2012 at 3:50 pm
TheSQLGuru (12/16/2012)
December 17, 2012 at 8:34 am
If I understand correctly, maybe something like below.
[Btw, as a general performance guideline, make sure the datatype of the time in the table exactly matches your list of times. ...
December 15, 2012 at 5:32 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 6,991 through 7,005 (of 7,608 total)