Viewing 15 posts - 6,616 through 6,630 (of 7,608 total)
Also, be sure to check: sys.sql_expression_dependencies.
And not just in its own db but in other dbs, esp. on the same instance.
And the usual disclaimer: even that isn't guaranteed to be...
March 28, 2013 at 8:49 am
There must be more fragmentation in a history table than a current-data-only table.
For single row lookups, this is not really a performance hit.
But for table scans, even partial ones, it...
March 28, 2013 at 7:28 am
EXEC sp_MSforeachdb '
IF NOT EXISTS(SELECT 1 FROM [?].sys.tables WHERE name = N''myTable'')
RETURN
SELECT ''?'' AS Db_Name, *
FROM [?]..mytable
'
March 27, 2013 at 11:11 am
My best guess on the very limited info so far is something like this:
select MonthName, DocName, count(distinct day(appointment_date)) as days_worked
from Appointments
group by MonthName, DocName
March 27, 2013 at 8:57 am
You could easily use master for that. Especially given that you must use master for some procedures anyway. Moreover, it's much easier from SQL2005 on to distinguish your...
March 27, 2013 at 8:52 am
sp_MSforeachdb is indeed a cursor, and not a particularly good one.
Still, it exists, and it's useful for quick-and-dirty tasks sometimes, particularly if you don't have a lot of dbs.
So, I'll...
March 26, 2013 at 4:25 pm
Sean Lange (3/26/2013)
nitin_456 (3/25/2013)
March 26, 2013 at 11:09 am
The main table would still hold the entire current record. Even if the history table contains the current record, you don't want to get it from there because of...
March 26, 2013 at 10:04 am
I don't see why it would necessarily be that bad, at least for a straightforward "row must match the username" check. I've done these a few times w/o any...
March 25, 2013 at 3:48 pm
And, finally, you don't really need SUBSTRING, LEFT is good enough :-):
SELECT @string, LEFT(@string, LEN(@string) - CHARINDEX('\', REVERSE(@string)) + 1)
March 25, 2013 at 3:46 pm
I wouldn't try using views, as then the table/view name changes every time, so you're forced to use dynamic SQL, which causes additional security headaches.
Instead, I suggest creating a controller...
March 25, 2013 at 3:38 pm
Your stated incrementation method is so unusual and customized that I'd suggest just creating table with pre-generated key values; and, when you need to increment by one, instead of...
March 25, 2013 at 3:34 pm
SQLKnowItAll (3/22/2013)
IT is worth noting that we have 6 different environments and making sure all logins have a synced sid is sometimes not realistic. So that is why I...
March 22, 2013 at 4:39 pm
SQLKnowItAll (3/22/2013)
ScottPletcher (3/22/2013)
SQLKnowItAll (3/22/2013)
ScottPletcher (3/22/2013)
March 22, 2013 at 4:33 pm
SQLKnowItAll (3/22/2013)
ScottPletcher (3/22/2013)
March 22, 2013 at 4:03 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 6,616 through 6,630 (of 7,608 total)