Viewing 15 posts - 4,051 through 4,065 (of 7,614 total)
You would at least have to remove anything that used a feature available in Enterprise Edition that's not also available in Standard Edition. No compressed tables, etc..
But once...
November 1, 2016 at 2:38 pm
Hard to determine exactly what you want, but my best guess is something like below; adjust the case conditions to be specifically what you need them to be:
select *
from (
...
November 1, 2016 at 2:15 pm
mitzyturbo (11/1/2016)
do you mean by just having a clustered index by the modified date on both log...
November 1, 2016 at 12:05 pm
Properly clustering should still allow a merge join, which should be much faster than anything you're having to do now.
November 1, 2016 at 11:17 am
Cluster the log table on the relevant arrival datetime that you are comparing by (rather than, presumably, a meaningless identity value). Then query directly from the table, joining to...
November 1, 2016 at 10:51 am
drew.allen (10/31/2016)
ScottPletcher (10/31/2016)
Latin actually is the base for many romance languages.
Latin is the base for ALL Romance languages. I have an MA in Linguistics, so I have some idea what...
October 31, 2016 at 3:41 pm
CELKO (10/28/2016)
This mistake is most commonly made by old COBOL programmers, because COBOL represents everything in character strings.
No, actually COBOL had numeric values as well. For example, packed decimal...
October 31, 2016 at 9:57 am
CELKO (10/31/2016)
I doubt the vast majority of developers today have even heard of COBOL, and they certainly have never programmed in it.
Yep, and nobody takes Latin either. Yet everywhere you...
October 31, 2016 at 7:57 am
david.jack (10/31/2016)
ScottPletcher (10/28/2016)
david.jack (10/28/2016)
ScottPletcher (10/27/2016)
Seems more confusing than the natural CASE statement to me:SUM(CASE WHEN VAL1 <> 0 THEN VAL1 ELSE VAL2 END)
VAL1 can return NULL unfortunately so using a...
October 31, 2016 at 7:42 am
I doubt the vast majority of developers today have even heard of COBOL, and they certainly have never programmed in it.
October 31, 2016 at 7:31 am
Can the addition of an index really cause SQL to produce that bad a plan? Considering it wasn't seeking on that index as far as I could see.
Yes, it can,...
October 28, 2016 at 4:46 pm
CELKO (10/28/2016)
October 28, 2016 at 1:43 pm
david.jack (10/28/2016)
ScottPletcher (10/27/2016)
Seems more confusing than the natural CASE statement to me:SUM(CASE WHEN VAL1 <> 0 THEN VAL1 ELSE VAL2 END)
VAL1 can return NULL unfortunately so using a comparison operator...
October 28, 2016 at 10:48 am
Seems more confusing than the natural CASE statement to me:
SUM(CASE WHEN VAL1 <> 0 THEN VAL1 ELSE VAL2 END)
October 27, 2016 at 10:35 am
You're right. Nvarchar shouldn't be used unless it's needed or realistically could be needed.
For example, if you create a two-character code column, there's no reason to use nvarchar, since...
October 26, 2016 at 4:26 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 4,051 through 4,065 (of 7,614 total)