Viewing 15 posts - 2,131 through 2,145 (of 7,614 total)
Wouldn't you want just the network? The recipients are email addresses, not phone numbers afaik.
@recipients = @N,
November 20, 2020 at 3:48 pm
WHERE
D >= DATEADD(MINUTE, DATEDIFF(MINUTE, 0, GETDATE()) / 15 * 15, 0) AND
D < DATEADD(MINUTE, DATEDIFF(MINUTE, 0, GETDATE())...
November 19, 2020 at 9:12 pm
For the ~100K rows in the tmp table, what percent range of the DeliveryTimetableID values in the larger tables do they represent?
That is, if the min/max values of DeliveryTimetableID in...
November 19, 2020 at 7:16 pm
SELECT B.InsDtTime, A.RunDate, A.AID, A.AValue AS NewValue, B.AValue AS OldValue
FROM #tblTest1 A
CROSS APPLY (
SELECT TOP (1) *
FROM #tblTest2 B
...
November 19, 2020 at 6:59 pm
Hmm, unless your data involves most of the table, I would think SQL could use a MERGE join rather than the HASH join for all those rows. Would you be...
November 19, 2020 at 2:55 pm
Everything we do today is affected by punchcards, and then by COBOL. Look at how 00 programming still assumes a procedural model.
Are you surprised that all animals have DNA?...
November 18, 2020 at 11:54 pm
IF (
(
(ABS(SIGN(@Var1-@VarA)))
...
November 18, 2020 at 11:43 pm
Similar to what Grant mentioned, I'd suggest creating a table to help manage the process. Run a process every day to update the table with the next...
November 18, 2020 at 10:33 pm
In the old days, particularly with PL/1, we would do the multiple IF's. Because it was easy to slip a new punchcard in the deck when we found we...
November 18, 2020 at 10:28 pm
> we renamed the sql error log out file in agent properties <<
I think that would require a recycle of SQL Server. You don't need to do that. You should...
November 18, 2020 at 10:06 pm
Try better clustering in a test system somewhere. You might be pleasantly astounded by the results.
Table dbo.TSys_Lookup_Date D should almost certainly be clustered first on [Date].
Try clustering dbo.T_DeliveryTimetableItem and dbo.T_DeliveryTimetableItemResolvedCost...
November 18, 2020 at 9:58 pm
Similar to what Grant mentioned, I'd suggest creating a table to help manage the process. Run a process every day to update the table with the next day's planned...
November 18, 2020 at 9:48 pm
It's not worth that risk for such a tiny gain.
In a single execution, the gain may be small, bring it up to 100K/Sec and that...
November 18, 2020 at 4:54 pm
Waiting for locks is normal in SQL Server (or any other relational db).
Whether the waits are excessive is a different q.
Since you've provided no details, to reduce bad effects of...
November 18, 2020 at 4:51 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 2,131 through 2,145 (of 7,614 total)