Viewing 15 posts - 11,701 through 11,715 (of 13,849 total)
Hi Steve
It's easy - take a look here.
I am happy to have been of help - although, with hindsight, I feel that we should have got to this sooner 🙂
Phil
December 3, 2010 at 2:22 am
Sounds like you're well on the way to creating a script component to do the job.
I will write down my thoughts, just in case they include anything you haven't considered.
The...
December 3, 2010 at 1:19 am
Craig Farrell (12/2/2010)
LutzM (12/2/2010)
You'd basically use a script component after your data...
December 2, 2010 at 12:33 pm
Finally we are getting somewhere, I think.
For this task, forget the FST. You can delete the entire dataflow actually.
Just configure an Execute Process task on the Control Flow pane to...
December 2, 2010 at 8:55 am
I am afraid that you have not answered my question. Until you can tell me why you cannot use
move *.*
I am not going to post further.
December 2, 2010 at 8:32 am
Steve Hindle-535638 (12/2/2010)
December 2, 2010 at 8:20 am
I must be missing something. Why not use the wildcard option? Then you don't need to know the file names.
December 2, 2010 at 8:08 am
Steve Hindle-535638 (12/2/2010)
December 2, 2010 at 7:43 am
So do these variables merely contain folder paths and you want your task to loop round all files in <source_folder> and move them to <destination_folder>?
Or do the values of the...
December 2, 2010 at 7:29 am
This can definitely be done. What problem are you having?
December 2, 2010 at 7:08 am
I am also interested to know what will happen to this table in future. Will it be maintained incrementally (via appropriate UPDATEs and INSERTs) - in which case is this...
December 2, 2010 at 7:06 am
Nice solution - I'm sure others will use it.
Phil
December 2, 2010 at 7:02 am
The title of this thread refers to columns, yet your posts refer to rows. That's an important difference - which do you mean?
For future reference, when you get an error...
December 2, 2010 at 5:17 am
jbelina (12/1/2010)
I recently came across the same problem and changing the max concurrency to 1 seemed to fix my problem. Hope this help! 😀
/MAXCONCURRENT " -1 "
Your text states...
December 1, 2010 at 9:15 am
Part 2 is the tricky bit though. If you've done this before, I think it would be useful if you could provide a code snippet.
Tricky because
"1,400.00",17.50,300
needs to become
"1400.00",17.50,300...
November 30, 2010 at 7:18 am
Viewing 15 posts - 11,701 through 11,715 (of 13,849 total)