Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
The problem in this is that it's very hard to prove "lack of intent", just as it's hard to prove any negative. With lawyers and courts operating on the...
March 31, 2009 at 1:53 pm
Bigfoot (3/31/2009)
I disagree that the definition is in the ear of the beholder.
My aunt was...
March 31, 2009 at 1:51 pm
GSquared (3/31/2009)
(Which begs the question, what the heck were they thinking when they hired her in the first place? It's not like it was a subtle problem.)
The interviewers probably...
March 31, 2009 at 1:03 pm
At my work, I've seen playful teasing and sometimes ignorance towards the fact that women are nearby during casual conversation among some of the men in the office, but it's...
March 31, 2009 at 11:57 am
I have a question related to this... Does the Read_File procedure operate the same in 2008 as it did in 2000? I'm having problems with a script that worked fine...
March 6, 2009 at 2:59 pm
Sounds like what I'm doing right now. 🙂
But I've always felt that it's the people you work with who make a job good, bad or boring. So I'm in no...
February 4, 2009 at 8:11 am
Alrighty then. Thanks for your help, I guess I'll get working on maybe some kind of application that I can run the whole process through...
January 23, 2009 at 11:30 am
OK, thanks. I'll see if it's possible to upgrade, but if not? Should I just chop up the XMLs and run this multiple times? Or is there an easier way...
January 23, 2009 at 11:16 am
could the problem with the xml be the encoding? I've bee using ansi right now. From what I can tell though, it should work with ANSI.
January 23, 2009 at 7:28 am
Then this popped up:
Warning: Null value is eliminated by an aggregate or other SET operation.
Msg 6603, Level 16, State 1, Server VBSA, Procedure sp_xml_preparedocument, Line 28
XML parsing error: Invalid at...
January 20, 2009 at 2:23 pm
Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)