Matt Whitfield (1/1/2009)

---

Daym.

Has anyone told him about...

Haroon Said (12/24/2008)

---

Just for fun if you had a banking application with millions of account records in a table and had to calculate some complex interest every day on the...

Matt Whitfield (12/24/2008)

---

@jacroberts -

I didn't get any faster results out of the firehose than I did out of the select-only method. I ran it a few times, they came out...

Shane Redding (12/24/2008)

---

Does anyone know where all this negativity came from about cursors? All I've read about this year are articles saying get away from cursors, "Very Bad" for your...

Matt Whitfield (12/24/2008)

---

Having modified that script a bit, and run it on my server - the time was 23.078 secs. Improved, certainly, but not better.

SET NOCOUNT ON

declare @query varchar(100), @id...

Could you list one thing that's a good idea in this article, spelling mistakes aside?

A bit of an odd example to pick. All that effort to avoid using a cursor on an example that executes dbcc checkdb for each of just a few rows....

My original actual query was a lot different and maybe I've over simplified it for want of a simple example. I used to have two tables, RefDates which was just...

Jeff Moden (11/28/2008)

---

jacRoberts,

I have SET NOCOUNT ON in the test code so I can't do the verification. Pardon me for asking stupid questions, but I have to check... Have...

Jeff Moden (11/28/2008)

---

I'm not sure what's going on... I ran the code you modified and here's what I got...

===== Set based method with Date table =====

SQL Server Execution Times:

...

Joe Celko (11/28/2008)

---

Let me make an appeal to simple logic.

You build a look-up table once (and if you did a proper calendar table, you also benefit from other uses). ...

Jeff Moden (11/27/2008)

---

jacroberts (11/27/2008)

---

Ok, I have recently written some code that uses an RBAR TVF to increase the efficiency and speed of a query.

Here's my example:

We had a...

Lynn Pettis (11/27/2008)

---

jacroberts (11/27/2008)

---

Lynn Pettis (11/27/2008)

---

jacroberts (11/27/2008)

---

timothyawiseman (11/27/2008)

---

jacroberts (11/25/2008)

---

timothyawiseman (11/24/2008)[hr

This is true, for a small number of rows. Your RBAR TVF will become ineffecient should requirements change and the...

Lynn Pettis (11/27/2008)

---

jacroberts (11/27/2008)

---

timothyawiseman (11/27/2008)

---

jacroberts (11/25/2008)

---

timothyawiseman (11/24/2008)[hr

This is true, for a small number of rows. Your RBAR TVF will become ineffecient should requirements change and the number of rows...

timothyawiseman (11/27/2008)

---

jacroberts (11/25/2008)

---

timothyawiseman (11/24/2008)[hr

>>The problem is that your example did not show a case where efficiency is not a concern.

>>But, in your example you say there is no need to...