Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,596 through 2,610 (of 2,643 total)

  • RE: Cursors Be Gone!

    The first bit of testing is finished. Firstly I am just testing the different initial queries to get the data. So no results from the cursors yet. I've had to...

  • RE: Cursors Be Gone!

    Matt Whitfield (1/3/2009)


    @jacroberts - can you include that last one in your test runs monday? I know it's cheating, but I think coming up with the best performing solution is...

  • RE: Cursors Be Gone!

    Jeff Moden (1/3/2009)


    jacroberts (1/3/2009)


    I take is that @PrevKeep variable is redundant as it doesn't seem to be used?

    BWAA-HAAA!!! Well, at least I know someone read the code. Yes...

  • RE: Cursors Be Gone!

    I take is that @PrevKeep variable is redundant as it doesn't seem to be used?

    BWAA-HAAA!!! Well, at least I know someone read the code. Yes sir, I made...

  • RE: Cursors Be Gone!

    Jeff Moden (1/3/2009)


    OK... here we go. First, I'm gonna recommend that you add the following index to the WebLogEvents table... it will NOT interfere with inserts or deletes, will...

  • RE: Cursors Be Gone!

    Jeff Moden (1/3/2009)


    jacroberts (1/2/2009)


    The stored procedure that calls the function just takes the results table from the TVF and inserts this into a reporting table number of new site visits...

  • RE: Cursors Be Gone!

    Matt Whitfield (1/2/2009)


    Before i start - a couple of things. Given the volume of data you're talking about, i'm not confident my first method would be quicker. Because it's a...

  • RE: Cursors Be Gone!

    Jeff Moden (1/2/2009)


    Ok... from JacRobert's description, Create Table statement, and a couple of good guesses like the fact that since all the columns are nullable, there's no primary key, here's...

  • RE: Cursors Be Gone!

    Jeff Moden (1/2/2009)


    I agree... JacRoberts, would you provide the CREATE TABLE statement for the dbo.WebLogEvents table, please. From that, I'll make a million row table over a period of...

  • RE: Cursors Be Gone!

    TheSQLGuru (1/2/2009)


    jacroberts, I am pretty sure (>90%) that your problem can be solved with a self-join set-based solution. If the table is properly indexed that solution could well be...

  • RE: Cursors Be Gone!

    Jeff Moden (1/2/2009)


    Alexander Kuznetsov (12/24/2008)


    Actually in most cases the best alternative is a loop written in a modern language such as C#, not a T-SQL WHILE loop or a CURSOR....

  • RE: Cursors Be Gone!

    battelofhalfwits (1/1/2009)


    Also, when you say "Imagine scaling the cursor to tables with millions of rows". I'm imagining it! Are you sure that inserting the rows into a temporary table with...

  • RE: Cursors Be Gone!

    Jeff Moden (1/1/2009)


    One of my fellow MVP's... Go back and look at Grant's posts... you'll figure it out. I've probably said too much, already.

    When you say "fellow MPV's" does...

  • RE: Cursors Be Gone!

    Matt Whitfield (1/1/2009)


    Jeff Moden (1/1/2009)


    Yes! He actually want's to delete FROM from UPDATE. The smiley face was an indication of something else this time...

    Daym.

    Has anyone told him about...

  • RE: Cursors Be Gone!

    Haroon Said (12/24/2008)


    Just for fun if you had a banking application with millions of account records in a table and had to calculate some complex interest every day on the...

Viewing 15 posts - 2,596 through 2,610 (of 2,643 total)