Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 94 total)
What do you mean by "individual join"?
Good question! I have used collate in joins before. It seems that this question isn't really about collation, but more about what the...
April 21, 2025 at 12:53 pm
Thanks, Steve. That makes more sense.
March 6, 2025 at 6:04 pm
Thanks for the article. I'm struggling to find a situation where I would actually choose CHOOSE. (See what I did there?) I don't want to hard code values into CHOOSE....
March 6, 2025 at 1:24 pm
They're not orphaned. Orphaned users are in the database, but do not have a corresponding login associated with them. You have the opposite. These are server logins that have not...
January 16, 2025 at 2:08 pm
My mistake. Sysusers actually represents logins, not users. I haven't referenced that view in a long time. Logins get created at the server level and users get created at the...
January 16, 2025 at 2:00 pm
Yeah, you can't update system catalogs. We haven't been able to do that since SQL 2000, I think. Also, sys.sysusers is an old view that's only there for backward compatibility. ...
January 16, 2025 at 1:41 pm
I have to agree with edmil. A hash bailout occurs when a hashing operation reaches its maximum recursion level and shifts to an alternative query plan to process the remaining...
January 9, 2025 at 1:52 pm
From BOL:
Nested comments are supported. If the /* character pattern occurs anywhere within an existing comment, it is treated as the start of a nested comment and, therefore, requires a...
October 23, 2024 at 3:23 pm
Archie,
You are correct. That was an over sight on my part. I didn't test it with SQL 2000. The question should have stated that this was for...
November 23, 2011 at 6:43 am
Hugo,
Thanks for the feedback. I agree that the explanation could be better, but through my research on the topic, I couldn't find an adequate explanation for this behavior. ...
November 23, 2011 at 6:41 am
Disregard my last post. I just realized that the SQL Server Express server is not in mixed mode, which probably accounts for the NULL.
Greg
July 21, 2011 at 9:53 am
I tried it on several of our servers, both 2005 and 2008, and received '1900-01-01 00:00:00.000'. All of these were enterprise edition. I also tried it on one...
July 21, 2011 at 9:47 am
Today is also the day that the Titanic sank and President Abraham Lincoln died.
Doh!! Someone beat me to it!
April 15, 2011 at 6:56 am
Great job, Craig! This is a great idea for a topic. One that isn't discussed often. I cannot count the number of horrendous job postings that I...
April 14, 2011 at 8:35 am
Yes, it was possible to move the resource database in SQL2005.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms345408%28v=SQL.90%29.aspx
Thanks,
Greg
February 11, 2011 at 6:35 am
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 94 total)