Viewing 15 posts - 9,526 through 9,540 (of 59,091 total)
I agree... it wasn't broken earlier today.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 2, 2019 at 7:06 pm
Ah... understood. And, just to confirm, I am getting emails from posts like this. I see that you are, too.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 2, 2019 at 7:04 pm
I confirm that.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 2, 2019 at 6:57 pm
I've changed it to the upper bound of the software, so you now have 190 years to edit posts.
Awesome. I'll give it a try. Thanks,...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 2, 2019 at 6:55 pm
I've not seen an email in a while, either. Using this post to test for that.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 2, 2019 at 6:53 pm
I've changed it to the upper bound of the software, so you now have 190 years to edit posts.
Awesome. I'll give it a try. Thanks, Dave.
BTW... I hope you...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 2, 2019 at 5:49 pm
We can look at setting it as a preference, but we were asked not to have it on by default.
Guess I should have asked to have it on before....
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 2, 2019 at 4:10 pm
To be sure, I'd never recommend clicking on such links in such a post (and I know you didn't so just saying it out loud for others that may read...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 2, 2019 at 3:27 pm
I tried your /EDIT hack (good idea, BTW) but it didn't work for me. In any case, it should be fixed.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 2, 2019 at 3:22 pm
Agreed. Being able to set such things as personal preferences would be outstanding. I still think the defaults should be as I say for those folks that are new to...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 2, 2019 at 3:01 pm
Another example of an SSC link not working appears in today's articles (https://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/reaping-the-benefits-of-the-window-functions-in-t-sql-2). The link at the bottom of that article for DelimitedSplit8K results in the "Oops" page.
The link to...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 2, 2019 at 2:54 pm
To add an example of why it's so very important to find only SSC articles by author rather than having to sift through sometimes hundreds of blog entries, I'm trying...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 2, 2019 at 2:16 pm
Ditto that.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 2, 2019 at 2:05 pm
Hi Dave,
A good test might be to look at the signature line for Sean Lange... he has several links in his signature line. Some work and some don't.
Also, another test...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 2, 2019 at 1:54 pm
Ditto Solomon's observation. A lot of people do take to remembering that some author wrote something rather than the link to the article that they're trying to re-find.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 2, 2019 at 1:47 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 9,526 through 9,540 (of 59,091 total)