Viewing 15 posts - 57,241 through 57,255 (of 59,067 total)
Mind sharing the solution?
Also, using ISQL is "Death by SQL" because, compared to OSQL, it is severely deprecated. Change the ISQL to OSQL and you'll be much better off.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 12, 2006 at 2:49 pm
It may be a permissions issue... whoever you're logged in as may not have permissions to see '\\Servar2\test\xx.bak'. Try pasting that UNC into Windows Explorer (then hit CR, of course). ...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 12, 2006 at 2:46 pm
Thought I'd throw a different slant at this one because it's an "open ended" report with no definite constraints on how many reporting periods may be requested within the start...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 11, 2006 at 8:37 pm
Sorry folks... I had posted some code and there was an error in it because the date part for weeks is acting very odd... trying to see what's up with...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 11, 2006 at 6:47 pm
Looking at it now...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 10, 2006 at 9:17 pm
Robert,
In my haste, I missed the SPID thing. Clever to say the least. Thanks for the feedback.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 10, 2006 at 7:01 pm
If you run Serqiy's method, you can let it "crawl" all day... it will not interfere with normal daily processes...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 10, 2006 at 6:59 pm
There is another problem with Wrack's function, as well... it returns the date as an Integer... if you want to compare the date it returns to a DATETIME column, you...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 10, 2006 at 7:36 am
I'm thinking that just a little irresponsible on your part. Good night, Lynn.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 9, 2006 at 11:26 pm
I agree that good teachers work themselves out of a job with their students... the point is that you misread the question and provided an incorrect answer. Thank you for...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 9, 2006 at 11:19 pm
Good teachers are always responsible for the outcome...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 9, 2006 at 11:02 pm
Folks, go back and read Vladan's post... that's the only correct way to do it. He explains "why" quite nicely, too.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 9, 2006 at 10:59 pm
Careful... that, too, will likely cause a table scan because the column in the WHERE clause is contained in a formula...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 9, 2006 at 10:57 pm
Well, when folks post such detailed information about how their code works (very nice job, by the way), others take the code and just use it instead of analyzing it. ...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 9, 2006 at 10:43 pm
Sure, that's what he said he thought the logic should be... he said immediately after that...
"Is the logic correct? Can someone please help me decipher...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 9, 2006 at 10:29 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 57,241 through 57,255 (of 59,067 total)