Viewing 15 posts - 56,431 through 56,445 (of 59,069 total)
Heh... yeah, I was talking about the indexes. BTW (dunno if you took it this way) Didn't mean to make it sound like that whole thing was directed at you or...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 15, 2007 at 11:57 pm
I strongly recommend that you do NOT store images in your database... store the file names in the database and let the app load them.
See my next post below for...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 15, 2007 at 11:51 pm
Post the cursor and some info about what it's supposed to be doing. A little table info would help, too. You'd be amazed at what folks can do about getting...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 15, 2007 at 11:49 pm
I gotta look that one up, Steve... I very well could be having a problem with convincing the DBA if my definition of what a heap is is incorrect. My...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 15, 2007 at 8:10 am
Thanks... that's gotta be a 2005 thing, huh? Wondered when they would get around to forcing that issue...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 15, 2007 at 8:04 am
I'm not at work right now... I'll dig it up when I get there. I normally have access from home but not on this particular DB...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 15, 2007 at 8:01 am
Not sure what you mean, Ronda. What kind of a sort are you talking about?
My real concern is over "entity integrity".... or, if you will, a table without a Primary...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 15, 2007 at 7:43 am
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/columnists/jmoden/calculatingworkdays.asp
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 15, 2007 at 1:35 am
Heh... maybe that's it! I should thank him, huh? ![]()
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 15, 2007 at 1:32 am
Yep... that's the position I was taking... just wanted to make sure there wasn't some exotic reason I was missing. Thanks for the feedback, folks.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 14, 2007 at 9:36 pm
Yep... check Books Online... SQL Server has had it for a while now. It also has ROLLUP which is like CUBE but without all the extra subtotals.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 14, 2007 at 9:32 pm
It would be done pretty much the same way in MS-SQL Server as you did in Oracle... unless you used a cursor which is not the most effective way to...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 14, 2007 at 9:17 pm
No, Sir, David... you're not wrong... but not for the reasons you state...
First, let's build a small table of only 10,000 rows with only the data with which we are...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 14, 2007 at 8:43 pm
Yeah... that's what I mean
Stuff like that...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 14, 2007 at 6:02 am
Heh... my boss' boss says that all the time... it's why our projects seem to go in so fast... who cares if it takes six months extra to fix what we...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 14, 2007 at 6:00 am
Viewing 15 posts - 56,431 through 56,445 (of 59,069 total)