Viewing 15 posts - 56,341 through 56,355 (of 59,072 total)
Heh... yeah... When I started my post, your post wasn't there yet... I got interupted and came back to it. When I finally did post (forum hint: I always copy...
May 24, 2007 at 7:56 am
Kinda... if you don't consider any type of rounding, the FLOAT 17 digit's in the example I gave came up with the wrong answer...
But, after re-reading your posts, I...
May 24, 2007 at 7:51 am
>> For the above if there is no backup with in last 24 hrs then it will show null.
Does that mean the query did want you wanted or not?
May 24, 2007 at 7:33 am
Yeah... didn't even look at that part, Serqiy... just knew the outer table was the wrong one and quit there... good catch.
May 24, 2007 at 7:31 am
Heh... the "golden plate" was correct... somebody forgot to wash the glass though
JacekO is correct... the method being suggested doesn't use...
May 24, 2007 at 7:24 am
Oh boy... you sure about that?
FLOAT is based on BINARY math which is also why it's so fast. The problem with Binary math is that you sometimes need more bits...
May 23, 2007 at 11:33 pm
<insert sound of applause here>
Heh... I absolutely agree on these types of posts and I used to get mad as hell at some of these folks... then it dawned on...
May 23, 2007 at 11:21 pm
Nicely done, Ed...
What I'd really like to know, though, in the original post, Janet said "I would like to call the function with my own datepart."...
My questions would be......
May 23, 2007 at 10:53 pm
Heh... must be because SQL Server couldn't easily read your code, either. ![]()
You need the outer join to be on the database table, not...
May 23, 2007 at 10:45 pm
| The same @Message will be sent every time, it won't change depending on the record. |
Ok... dunno about...
May 23, 2007 at 10:32 pm
It's always a golden plate... and a lot of it isn't available on the web until Serqiy puts it there... ![]()
May 23, 2007 at 10:29 pm
I don't have any websites I can direct you to, but here's a couple of my own...
May 23, 2007 at 10:21 pm
I'm pretty sure that when OSQL is used, any procs called by it are given the same spid. Of course, that's why testing is important.
Thanks for the heads-up...
May 23, 2007 at 7:27 pm
Heh... sorry Lynn... wasn't directed specifically at you... was a general comment. I agree with the idea of them allowing folks to "build comples queries incrementally".
The only thing I...
May 22, 2007 at 5:52 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 56,341 through 56,355 (of 59,072 total)