Viewing 15 posts - 55,936 through 55,950 (of 59,072 total)
Any feedback, Stephen?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 2, 2007 at 12:02 am
Like Remi says... why use a
cursor???
UPDATE TABLE_1
SET Rnd = RAND(CAST(NEWID() AS VARBINARY)) * 10000000000000
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 2, 2007 at 12:01 am
Any feedback, Anders?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 1, 2007 at 11:52 pm
Amrita?
I just love it when the OP doesn't respond... stab'n'grab. ![]()
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 1, 2007 at 11:48 pm
There are a number of ways to returns trees in a high speed fashion in SQL Server 2000.... are you simply having performance problems or are you just concerned with...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 1, 2007 at 11:46 pm
Concur...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 1, 2007 at 11:41 pm
It's just a gut feeling but your "need" is nothing more than a "feeling"... Hilton clients will understand that it's all the same company and they won't worry about ID...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 1, 2007 at 11:40 pm
Sorry for being a year late.
I thought the title of this article was "Sizing a Database"... not an advertisement for some 3rd party software.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 1, 2007 at 11:36 pm
Heh... I don't know and I'm sorry about that. I don't have 2l5, yet.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 1, 2007 at 11:30 pm
You might want to add something else to exclude statisics...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 1, 2007 at 11:28 pm
Do not shrink databases. Period. Fragmentation both at the database level and the file level is the result. There are execeptions, of course, but in general, do NOT shrink databases.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 1, 2007 at 11:24 pm
Heh... no way... two in the same lifetime is well enough for me
Learned a lot, laughed a lot, and puked a lot......
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 1, 2007 at 5:24 pm
What "language" is the "For Each loop container" written in? Seems like anything that can use wild cards should do...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 1, 2007 at 5:12 pm
No... all you need is to point BCP at the data on the other machine using a UNC... of course, BCP should be able to "see" it with the appropriate...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 1, 2007 at 5:09 pm
Thanks for the feedback, one and all... funny how the telcom business seems to need it the most ![]()
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 1, 2007 at 5:07 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 55,936 through 55,950 (of 59,072 total)