Viewing 15 posts - 55,651 through 55,665 (of 59,067 total)
Chaitra,
Any feed back on this? Was that the problem or something else?
July 24, 2007 at 8:54 pm
Oh shoot... although the answer to the formula above may have originally been posted incorrectly, I think I finally get this process that you're looking for... Not sure what the...
July 24, 2007 at 8:38 pm
And, sorry, I'm still not getting it... (2(20)+2(20-15)) = 50... not 45... True?
July 24, 2007 at 8:24 pm
Shoot, Lynn... I knew that... you knew that... I just wanted to make sure Kung Lao knew that.
Whether anyone suggests changing the server...
July 24, 2007 at 7:47 pm
??? He's already deleted the data by mistake... how is either method you suggest going to recover data that's already been deleted?
I agree...
July 24, 2007 at 7:32 pm
The other thing about Carl's trigger, is that it will actually update more than 1 row in the DCParty table whereas the original trigger would only update one row in...
July 24, 2007 at 6:25 pm
Nope... not a PATINDEX bug... and you don't need to mess with the server default settings (case sensitive servers are a huge pain!).
This will do it for you...
SELECT PATINDEX...
July 24, 2007 at 5:27 pm
Sure... if the @Column_Name variable contains something less than 2 characters, then because of the "-2" modifier in it, BOOM!
Can't help much more than that 'cause I don't know what...
July 24, 2007 at 4:44 pm
Good workaround, but a bit slow and resource intensive if you have millions of rows...
Something like the following works very fast... yeah, it does use dynamic SQL but that's only...
July 24, 2007 at 8:44 am
Why do you need a white paper on the fact that if two users use a function, they get their own answers? It's that way with any function in any...
July 24, 2007 at 8:38 am
Also, almost forgot... you can shrink TempDB (by file) as with any other DB without bouncing the server (possibly as Sugesh suggested). It could cause a fairly long wait time, though......
July 24, 2007 at 8:33 am
If the batch size of BCP/BULK INSERT is relatively small (less than a million rows, say), then those are likely not the problem. Rumor has it that the extensive use of...
July 24, 2007 at 8:30 am
No... not ready to make that recommendation. We first need to identify what change was made to cause the code to suddenly go south several days ago. Quick fix would...
July 24, 2007 at 8:22 am
Viewing 15 posts - 55,651 through 55,665 (of 59,067 total)