Viewing 15 posts - 55,021 through 55,035 (of 59,078 total)
PCQ,
It's kinda like asking us to fix your car without seeing the car. Please post the offending code and table structure along with maybe some sample data
September 15, 2007 at 4:43 pm
I guess BOL doesn't have a really simple explanation of what an INDEX SEEK is nor why it's better than an INDEX SCAN...
Basically, the name of each says it all......
September 15, 2007 at 9:03 am
But this is an example of what I'm talking about... this was first on the returns for Google when I searched for "CHART OF SYSTEM TABLES FOR SQL SERVER". ...
September 15, 2007 at 8:43 am
This is one place where a "control loop" will help... write the code to only update a couple million at a time in a loop until everything has been updated. You'll be...
September 14, 2007 at 8:18 pm
UPDATE: check col by col, if any change value exists, updated is performed with the following statement for any... |
September 14, 2007 at 8:10 pm
| This is a great advantage in parameter use... |
Why? Why do you need to pass a table as a...
September 14, 2007 at 5:16 pm
Yes... that will work but it's not "dynamic" like the Op asked... if the length is a variable, it will not display as expected in the Text Pane.
September 14, 2007 at 5:09 pm
This is where you ask "What is Books Online"? ![]()
"Books Online" is affectionately known simply as "BOL". In SQL Server 2000, you can find...
September 14, 2007 at 5:02 pm
I'm thinking that probably won't matter on BCP that uses "QueryOut" ![]()
September 14, 2007 at 4:21 pm
Thanks Carl...
September 14, 2007 at 4:19 pm
... or... create a partioned view...
September 14, 2007 at 4:15 pm
Peter... try SUBSTRING with a variable for length or RTRIM in the text mode on a wide column to see what the OP means... displayed column comes out too wide...
September 14, 2007 at 8:17 am
Perfect... thanks for the feedback, Scott.
September 14, 2007 at 8:15 am
Nah... that wasn't it... set mine to 40 and still worked on Authors table...
Sorry for the bum info ![]()
September 13, 2007 at 10:48 pm
I believe you need an additional batch command...
mode con[:] [cols=c] [lines=n]
September 13, 2007 at 10:34 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 55,021 through 55,035 (of 59,078 total)