Viewing 15 posts - 54,751 through 54,765 (of 59,072 total)
Heh... I'm old... I've got no "recall" left until I've had about 20 coffees (if I recall correctly) 😀
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 2, 2007 at 6:12 pm
Tomm Carr (10/2/2007)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 2, 2007 at 6:08 pm
I missed what you're talking about... which movie, Remi?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 2, 2007 at 6:02 pm
Bingo, Scott... took the words right out of my mouth... don't need the EXE to gen decent XML... it can all be done in T-SQL...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 2, 2007 at 6:01 pm
Just a little warning... you are using an undocumented behaviour and a SP could belly up your project.
Ummm... what undocumented behaviour?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 2, 2007 at 5:47 pm
Bob Fazio (10/2/2007)
in 210 seconds. I am going to see if I can get this...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 2, 2007 at 5:46 pm
TheSQLGuru (10/2/2007)
Good proof that index maintenance really DOES have a price! I like the update mechanism you used too Jeff.
Thank you much!
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 2, 2007 at 5:43 pm
p.s. If you think a Group By would be better, all I can say is "try it"... I think you'll be surprised at how bad it is...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 2, 2007 at 7:49 am
. How many internal rows will be generated by the following query (assuming the original 830 rows provided by Microsoft)? (Easy to do... run it with Execution Plan turned on...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 2, 2007 at 7:45 am
Oh, by the way, Gail... we had emailed back an forth a couple of times on examples when the Estimated Execution plans lies like a rug... the Northwind example I...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 2, 2007 at 6:44 am
Heh... correct on both problems...
English skills on the part of the people I interviewed was not the problem, though. When you draw 1416 on a white board and say...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 2, 2007 at 6:39 am
Nah... we'd loose the audiance between comebacks just like we did on this one 😀
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 2, 2007 at 6:22 am
Heh, yeah... the key was the @Dummy variable in this case. Needed it to get by the mix of columns and variables because the value wasn't necessary. The...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 2, 2007 at 6:20 am
Show me why the space calculations are wrong or why any calculation can justify the unnecessary space wasted and unnecessary performance hit of auditing inserts.
And, although you said...
"Trying to...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 2, 2007 at 12:41 am
Heh... maybe... it did turn our shining carriage into a pumkin...:D
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 2, 2007 at 12:21 am
Viewing 15 posts - 54,751 through 54,765 (of 59,072 total)