Viewing 15 posts - 54,196 through 54,210 (of 59,089 total)
No, no... I believe a checksum of each row would allow you to check for uniqueness across the 24 columns. Lookup CHECKSUM in BOL...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 12, 2007 at 6:31 am
Is this a separate request or added requirements to what has been done already?
... and NVL is ORACLE... the equivelant in SQL Server is ISNULL... but why would you not...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 12, 2007 at 6:26 am
Just a different slant on things...
-- DROP TABLE #T
GO
--===== Create a table to store the results in
CREATE TABLE #T
(
...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 11, 2007 at 10:40 pm
And, please don't post duplicate posts.... we'll find ya...
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic420902-145-1.aspx
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 11, 2007 at 10:09 pm
Duplicate post...
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic420896-146-1.aspx
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 11, 2007 at 10:07 pm
Lordy, I hate setting up test data for payroll examples... whatever...
Here's some code that generates 100,000 entries for 200 employes for a year's worth of payroll following your rules...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 11, 2007 at 9:30 pm
So, double check one more time...
All indexes (indluding primary keys) on the test box are also available on the production box.
All tables have the same row count on both boxes.
All...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 11, 2007 at 5:29 pm
You didn't listen to me... lookup "expanding hierarchies" in Books Online and adapt it. It WILL do as you ask.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 11, 2007 at 5:18 pm
Oh, little nuances like will there ever be more than 2 names in a class? If so, do all the scores have to be the same or just 2?...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 11, 2007 at 9:16 am
Yes, there's an easy way to do the whole thing... without a loop. The loop is just going to make this very slow...
Recommend you post your code and let's...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 11, 2007 at 6:55 am
And, to be sure, it DOES matter where you put the filters in the case of an OUTER JOIN.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 11, 2007 at 6:52 am
I think you're gonna need to be a bit more specific in your question... I for one, have no idea what your question is actually about.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 11, 2007 at 6:31 am
Activity counts, basically...
Something like 1 point per post, 1 or 2 points per script (not sure there), etc.
Notice that these are also migrated from the "old" format of the forum...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 11, 2007 at 6:29 am
I don't think so, but links are sometimes a bit picky. If you don't find any other problem, I think I'd set up a small test to make sure.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 11, 2007 at 5:44 am
Add an IDENTITY column to the table with the correct seed...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 10, 2007 at 12:15 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 54,196 through 54,210 (of 59,089 total)