Viewing 15 posts - 53,191 through 53,205 (of 59,068 total)
I happened to be doing a little research on different methods for finding "gaps" and ran across this article. Here's a much faster way to find gaps... and, it...
January 2, 2008 at 3:04 am
Now, I'm worried for you... the practice of "finding gaps" in a "sequence" column is usually accompanied by the insane idea that you'd ever reuse missing numbers. The INT...
January 2, 2008 at 2:03 am
Gail is 100% correct... if all you want to do is add a "sequence" number to the table, then just add an IDENTITY column as she described.
January 2, 2008 at 1:13 am
I always create them as "dbo" and grant privs... saves a lot of hassle...
January 1, 2008 at 8:39 pm
I think keeping them in separate databases is usually a good idea... allows for customization by customer, if need be. If you write a script to accept a little...
January 1, 2008 at 8:34 pm
You must have slept through that part of the 431 prep...
Please tell me they don't actually teach how to use Triangular Joins to derive running totals 😛
January 1, 2008 at 8:29 pm
Just so everyone knows... that little slice of computational heaven will not parse the entire list if a number just happens to straddle the 4000 character mark. Instead, it...
January 1, 2008 at 2:41 pm
Also, if a fellow by the name of "Madhivanan" responds to this thread, he's got some very good advice on OpenRowSet...
January 1, 2008 at 1:18 pm
OpenRowSet is one fine way... please the following URL...
http://www.sql-server-helper.com/tips/read-import-excel-file-p01.aspx
That'll get you started... there are a couple of "finesse" tricks that we can talk about later on, but you need the...
January 1, 2008 at 1:17 pm
Mike C (1/1/2008)
January 1, 2008 at 1:06 pm
colin Leversuch-Roberts (1/1/2008)
January 1, 2008 at 1:02 pm
I appologize for the semantics... but, in SQL Server 2000, unless you take on the TEXT datatype as an input parameter, the largest character based variable you can define is...
January 1, 2008 at 12:39 pm
Steve Jones - Editor (1/1/2008)
Or this: http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Stored+Procedures/2977/
Heh... you think that's going to work on SQL Server 2000? This is a 2k forum, ya know 😛
January 1, 2008 at 12:19 pm
Heh... if it's a very well written query, it will always run the CPU to 100%... just for a very, very short time... and that's the goal... get everything done...
January 1, 2008 at 12:13 pm
Actually... good... typing on a blog lickety-split is one of the things that I'd like to get away from during an NCAA game. Leave your bloody laptops at home....
January 1, 2008 at 9:02 am
Viewing 15 posts - 53,191 through 53,205 (of 59,068 total)