Viewing 15 posts - 52,981 through 52,995 (of 59,098 total)
k.furness (1/12/2008)
This is single table that contains the following Fields:
ID [int] Identity
QuestionnaireID [int]
Q0 [smallint]
.
.
.
Q150 [smallint]
Don't think I can get it any normalized than it is, but if I...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 12, 2008 at 9:29 am
Actually... wasn't talking to him... 😉
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 11, 2008 at 10:11 pm
Heh... go around talking like those words, and you'll be labeled as pompous a$$ for sure...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 11, 2008 at 9:55 pm
If you have an answer to this, Ananth, just tell us... 😉
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 11, 2008 at 9:40 pm
If there's nothing that violates privacy laws or company policy, post the first ten lines of data so we can resolve this correctly, please.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 11, 2008 at 9:38 pm
This would be a good simple example for you to practice set based programming on... convert the cursor to set based.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 11, 2008 at 9:35 pm
The real fact is, you don't need BEGIN/END in a stored procedure. Try it... it's just allowed to make die hard Oracle programmers happy 😛
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 11, 2008 at 9:22 pm
No... that's why the column number is "0". Read up on BCP Format Files... especially the example about skipping unwanted columns.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 11, 2008 at 9:19 pm
I'm with Steve... I use mixed case... it enforces capitalization and it's easier to hit the shift key than it is to hit the underscore when typing.
I agree with the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 11, 2008 at 9:16 pm
Raghavender (1/11/2008)
Thank you for your reply
You didn't answer the question... What is it that you want to do and why do you think you need to modify the system tables...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 11, 2008 at 9:13 pm
As a DBA, you shouldn't... there's not much that can't be done in T-SQL with the possible exception of RegEx (Regular expressions) and, despite what Books Online says about the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 11, 2008 at 9:09 pm
You CANNOT rely on the "% of Batch" listed in estimated or actual execution plans to determine which query is best... it can "lie" because it can't always see everything......
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 11, 2008 at 9:01 pm
Doesn't even need to be SSIS... can be some decent stored procs. But the point is an excellent one...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 11, 2008 at 8:36 pm
UDF's are typically RBAR...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 11, 2008 at 8:32 pm
Heh... It's amazing to me how many undocumented databases there are in the world. It also amazes me how many there are with no DRI... no DRI means no...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 11, 2008 at 8:29 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 52,981 through 52,995 (of 59,098 total)