Viewing 15 posts - 52,816 through 52,830 (of 59,091 total)
I've seen requests like this before and they always puzzle me... it would appear that the name should be the primary key in this case. Yet, you have more...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 19, 2008 at 7:34 pm
waitfor usage can bring an entire application to a grinding halt in an instant:
Not sure what you mean... how?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 19, 2008 at 7:29 pm
If you do it right, more than you can possibly imagine...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 19, 2008 at 7:25 pm
The following URL has a lot of good information about Excel spreadsheets and ADODB... perhaps it'll have what you're looking for...
http://www.simple-talk.com/sql/t-sql-programming/sql-server-excel-workbench/
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 19, 2008 at 6:56 am
Also, not sure why you'd bother pinning it... it will certainly fit in cache.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 18, 2008 at 7:44 pm
17GB seems a bit large even if it's a Terabyte instance... if folks are using triangular joins, cursors for large record sets, temp tables for large record sets, views of...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 18, 2008 at 7:41 pm
remember this code was done based on BOL examples, but I don't remember the topic.
First, nice idea... hadn't thought about doing it that way. Great way to import...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 18, 2008 at 7:07 pm
Sergiy (1/14/2008)
Using "," as delimites is an error waiting to happen.
mdjtlj, ask you supplier to build a test file containing '19" Monitor'.
Then try to process that...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 18, 2008 at 7:05 pm
My question is: is there any way I can achieve this goal without the GROUP By phrase?
I could be wrong, but I don't think there is...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 18, 2008 at 6:33 pm
Alter table won't support a 4 part naming convention, anyway... object functions and Alter table all support 3 part naming conventions... why not use them?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 18, 2008 at 5:19 pm
If you have 20 columns in table A, and you try to list all 20 columns in the presence of a COUNT, then you must list all 20 columns in...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 18, 2008 at 5:13 pm
Shoot... I hope I didn't just help someone do their homework without them trying themselves, first...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 18, 2008 at 5:08 pm
This will do it... assuming that names are unique...
--===== Simulate the OPs table
-- This is NOT part of the solution
DECLARE @yourtable TABLE
...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 18, 2008 at 5:06 pm
Thanks... that's half the battle... 😉
Do you have any documentation on the record layout of the file you intend to import? And can you attach a file with,...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 18, 2008 at 4:40 pm
Heh... yep, I knew that Michael... sorry I didn't state things clearly... I wanted to know the condition of the OPs data.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 18, 2008 at 12:53 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 52,816 through 52,830 (of 59,091 total)